@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey it's also their complete and utter blanket and blatant disgust for white people specifically people who rejected communism

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey that part is not clear. They're ethnocentric. Israelis in general, and that clearly includes the elites. So are asians. Russians are also white and they embraced communism. It's western values that thwarted the commie takeover. Don't mistake the subversion of the west with hatred of whites SPECIFICALLY. The west is white, therefore, subversion toward marxism requires embracing non-whiteness.

They don't like niggers either, btw. It's just ethnocentrism.

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey the method of attack depends on the target. Did you know that japan is also facing a marxist attack on their culture?

We know the US is pushing faggotry and degeneracy on other nations. These ideas aren't spread in japan through hatred of whites. The tactics have to shift to attacking the japanese. That's not japanese hatred by "the jews." It's just part of the subversion.

@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey but they adopted western ideas like feminism and gynocentrism which again was pushed by Jews

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey and we're back to square one.

Jews AND other non-jew elites among them who want to expand the US empire. Who did not create feminism. They're opportunists who exploited what feminism and gynocentrism allowed them to do.

If you haven't noticed, I'm just regurgitating ideas TFM talked about from before his world view shifted overnight. They were true then and are still true now. Without jews communism & feminism would still exist. The cycle of hard times would still exist.

@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey the cycle would exist yes but I disagree with The presupposition that feminism would have naturally evolved by itself without some outside malevolent force pushing the division of family because that was what feminism was designed to do it was designed to separate the man and the woman and the woman from the children It was always a supremacist movement It was always a terrorist organisation

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey
>but I disagree with The presupposition that feminism would have naturally evolved by itself

The root of feminism is the woman's desire to be free to do as she pleases. All women are feminists in waiting. Even arab women. It's in their nature to be irresponsible childish whores. The only thing keeping that in check is male authority. All it takes is the right generation of simps (weak men) to acquiesce to women.

Jews didn't invent female nature or simps. Come on, man.

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey your brain is melting reading white nationalist gibberish.

@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey I'm not saying that Jews invented female nature, Weak men created feminism because they couldn't get laid so by abandoning the traditional role of men and women they would be able to create the opportunity to get laid Seneca Falls was 95% men and 5 % woman who couldn't find a man or were widowed and useless to men open up a history book we wouldn't even have woman's rights or voting if it wasn't for some cucked senator who had the swing vote

@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey he found a note in his lunch pack from his mother saying for him to "let us vote xo" literally a mummies boy and he caved and gave woman the vote and then it was all down hill from there look it up I'm not bullshiting you

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey I'm using that language to say that if jews were removed from existence, feminism would still come about because feminism snowballed into what it is today through weak men's mistakes. It took many generations to build up to where we are today. All of this would still happen without jews.

Feminism would still happen.

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey
>if jews were removed from existence

Try not to get too excited reading that. Put the dick down.

@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey we don't know that, that's a pretty good post hoc rationalisation but I don't think so man, the breakdown of the family unit was the first lynch pin to take the brakes off that would not have happened I believe if we didn't have the Jews in the first place

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey Time to study the collapse of the roman empire very carefully to see where the jews were operating. We know they did it.

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey I'm mocking you for that "ad hoc rationalization" bit, but how far back do we have to go & look into human behavior to see that jews aren't responsible for all bad decisions that lead to disastrous societal outcomes? Bad results occur without jews.

TFM talks about the root of progressivism as the social gospel movement. Is that the jews? What about slave morality? Was that the jews? What about the bad decisions in the Roman Republic and Empire? Was that downfall the jews?

@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey I wish we had the historical time machine so we could see how it all unfolded but ultimately I believe the division was started when Hadrian BTFO outta them and ever since then they've openly been plotting against any and all faiths that actively stand against them

@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey The cycle of hardship & the rise & fall of empires is just a game of human nature played by various players throughout history. Within our lifetimes, we're seeing a different iteration (think of it like a new season in sports) of the human game being played with a different set of players. Some of those players are jews among the elite, & we're in the hard times phase. Prior games were played without jewish power. Hard times were still inevitable.

This is a human problem.

@ButtWorldsMan @VooDooMedic it's not that weak men created female nature, but they since women are naturally weak and inferior, weak men can use women to advance their own goals.

It's not a coincidence that the first thing Progressives did was give women voting rights. They couldn't have passed the rest of their agenda without female support.

@Tfmonkey @ButtWorldsMan @VooDooMedic So weak men and progressive is code words for the Joooooooss

@Tfmonkey @VooDooMedic no one said weak men create female nature.

The argument is that feminism would rise naturally with the mixing of female nature and weak men who let go of women's leash. But feminism doesn't occur overnight. It's a snowball effect of bad decisions made by men through multiple generations, culminating in updated values. That's the game being played. The cycle. Future generations altering or forgetting the values and wisdom of previous strong man generations.

@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey @VooDooMedic I agree with ButtWorldsMan this point about the cycle, and I'd like to add that because this is a matter of human nature, all of this would be happening with X ethnicity instead of the Jews if the Jews went the way of the Scythians. Who it is doesn't matter; what matters is what you are willing to do to preserve yourself and your way of life.

@Tfmonkey @VooDooMedic But with regard to you, TFM, what I truly hope is that these overnight, worldview shifting revelations you've had don't make you dumber and more irrational over time. Collectivist thinking is a cancer.

My concerns are probably exaggerated, but I wanted to say it anyway.

@ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey @VooDooMedic I'd like to echo ButtWorldsMan on this. While I am pleased that you came to what seems to be a logical conclusion, beware the fallacy of composition which is inherent in collectivist thinking.

There are powerful people in the Cathedral who are Jews who support Israel at the expense of their ideological partners, and that means we have problems caused by THOSE Jews, not THE Jews.

I trust your judgement; just be wary.

@DoubleD @Tfmonkey @VooDooMedic He already brought up that he's not thinking about jews like Halsey or the like. At this moment it's not "all jews." But I've seen rabbit-hole thinking before. Look at voodoo trying to come up with new angles to look at the jewish problem from. I'm not talking about now, I'm talking about the future. My paranoia is seeing TFM years from now, with thinking aligned more with white nationalists, & focusing more & more on jewish power specifically. Parochial thinking.

@ButtWorldsMan @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey They were the moneychangers he who has the gold makes the rules

@Scubbie @ButtWorldsMan @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey Incorrect. He who holds the power of force makes the rules. Whether or not he is influenced by others is another question.

@DoubleD @ButtWorldsMan @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey Gold buys mercenary’s influence and manipulates power and force you can believe that if you want to that might is right bullshit

@DoubleD @ButtWorldsMan @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey Free Barabass

@Scubbie @ButtWorldsMan @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey How are you going to prevent someone from taking that gold from you by force: with either your own force or with force purchased with gold.

Might does make right. If you wish to show that anything other than force is the ultimate end of resolving disputes, please show me. I have yet to find an example of anything other than force, whether threatened or exercised, direct or by proxy, which has resolved conflicts.

@DoubleD @Scubbie @ButtWorldsMan @Tfmonkey i'm not saying the ultimate power isn't force

@VooDooMedic @DoubleD maybe you muted him but DD is responding to scubbie

@ButtWorldsMan @DoubleD i haven't muted him i didn't see the pings