Show newer

@sardonicsmile Additionally, there are different objectives a female will attempt to reach with different varieties of males.
Sex for fun and babies are had the attractive males who have good genes.
Relationships for companionship, protection, and provision are made with males who have social status or wealth.
For a female to achieve the outcomes for her terminal goals, she'd have children with the best genes and the provider with the most wealth. She doesn't care if they're different males.

@sardonicsmile
It's not just good looking men.
Attractiveness is a biological indicator of gene's healthiness and fitness. Wealth is an indicator of the means wield power within society by the exchange of goods. Social status is an indicator of the means to wield social power to obtain what is desired.

It's about expressions of power.

@Eiswald That's nature's catharsis. I too am one who appreciates the natural consequences of actions being experienced.

@haberdasher @kroner @Hoss There were many people who warned about female suffrage just like there were many who warned about universal suffrage, but when has that stopped people with ideals which don't conform to reality from arduously perusing them at the expense of everything save for their feelings?

@pepsi_man @deprecated_ii Maybe we have different definitions of profit. What do you think profit is?

@mkultra It's a fascinating universe, if a bit simple at times because the plot was driven by toy sales.

@sickburnbro Even if we assume the numbers are correct and if we remove all the low-cost workforce, where are we going to get workers to pay for the welfare for the rest of the collectors of benefits? The US has a below-replacement birthrate, and government spending exceeds tax revenue annually.

As an aside the $8/apple figure is more due to inflation than anything else.

@ButtWorldsMan I don't know if he intended it, but it's great.

@deprecated_ii If by "Wall St." you mean businesses making corrupt deals with government for regulation and preferential treatment to be shielded from the effects of the free market, then yes, I agree.

@deprecated_ii Why is that? Shouldn't they produce profit for those that own them? Isn't that what "shareholder value" is?

@Lorgar @dander @VooDooMedic It has the name of She Who Thirsts written all over it.

@Mommy She's 2D and wholesomely dressed. I'll allow it.

@UncleIroh @ButtWorldsMan I've heard some people state that with the increase in the standard of living, the breakdown of tightly-knit families and communities is inevitable, but I disagree. The breakdown of this culture as a direct effect of pro-socialist/communist activism via outlets such as the Fabian society which was concurrent with rapid increases in the standard of living is more to blame, I believe.

@AlphaKiloPapa @[email protected] @Furgar The progressive era brought into political reality many poisonous policies: from interventionism to direct democracy, to "pro-labor" policies, and female suffrage to name merely a few.

@ButtWorldsMan It disgusts me. I hear males in my work and other areas of life saying things to this effect. Beyond simply understanding of the situation, I wish so much to ask, "Have you no pride? Are you not willing to stake a claim on what is yours?"

I know the answer to these questions. As you rightly stated: subservient males: slaves of their own making.

It's always good to see you comment.

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.