@VooDooMedic I'm glad you tried to explain that TFM has been propagandised about BDSM.
I've tried to explain it as well, but he maintains the perception that it must involve pain or sex in some way even though that's not true.
I've been in several BDSM relationships, and most were life-style primary relationships rather than just session-based.
@VooDooMedic I think that BDSM was an outlet for people not to exercise the sadism/masochism kink in society as that was always done where it was desired in the bedroom, rather, it was a means by which those who desired to experience a power dynamic in a "safe" way. Western society doesn't understand BDSM, but it is a safe box into which vanilla people can put someone: "Oh, you have a sub and a family that operates like all families did 1000 years ago? That's fine because it's a kink."
@DoubleD @VooDooMedic Mainly it is about power dymamics of dominance and submission.
Where often man is dominant and woman submissive.
And there are many types of this.
Where you can do only spanking and choking with light bondage
Or some fuck up shit like cutting, beating, or whipping like this
skip to 3:10
https://efukt.com/24263_7_Was_Her_Limit.html
@DoubleD @Stahesh @VooDooMedic
This is what makes me laugh. From a Western woman's perspective, the Taliban are oppressive and misogynistic, but for the women who live there, it's mostly just normal. The weird shit was all the LGBT stuff we tried shoving down their throats.
But then western women are drawn to recreating the average Taliban woman's experience and then call it BDSM, or kink.
@Stahesh @VooDooMedic Unfortunately, those Ven diagrams demonstrate my point. BDSM doesn't have to involve any pain at all.