2:35:10 time "There would not be gay liberation without feminism movement"
Yuval Noah Harar is historian, philosopher, gay and citizen of Israel.
Yuval Noah Harari: Human Nature, Intelligence, Power, and Conspiracies | Lex Fridman Podcast #390
https://youtu.be/Mde2q7GFCrw?si=lfU82yHjtvX8IW7W&t=9310
@Stahesh @Tfmonkey If I easily summarize it,you wouldn't be able to comprehend for yourself,That BRICS is all in on the green initiative for climate change along with the UN and central Banks,and they also seek a treaty that will incorporate peace this all leads back to a world wide digital currency trade based of the carbon credit it has been planned BRICS was started by Goldman Sachs economist
@Tfmonkey Take the time to listen to what Xi is saying the goal of BRICS is at his speech in Russia
A philosophical discussion about the concept of Logos got deleted by YouTube, LOL.
@Justicar Because he no longer say something about hockey mask times.
After admiting it is jews he basically let Halsey speak their propaganda.
Or maybe it his old age where his mind does not work so well as before.
His best points were women nature and COVID.
Perhaps he is not as intelligent as we thought. Because in our minds we set bar too high.
@Justicar What you expect old man from military where he followed orders for most of his career.
Him as intelligence guy he probably needed to be strong military SUB to be able get their clearance.
He is alone and basically easily to manipulate by government or people. Not mentioning that he still keeps being nice guy to people and women.
For people that seek freedom ofthen try to experiment and seek their own path.
While there is strong evidence he is controled or forced to say some things.
@Justicar @CheshireHuman Because his ancestry comes from Pakistan( he called himself pakistani midget multiple times) so basically he is Indian.
NOt mentioning Indians have shorter lifespan than chinese or whites.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-India-s-life-expectancy-too-low
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-life-expectancy-of-Indians-lower-than-that-of-the-Chinese-and-Americans
If I ever see or hear the words "you are voting against your interests", my response is this:
So tell me what my interests are.
The person making the initial assertion will either need to know me very well to accurately assess how I should change my voting patterns to align with my interests or they should admit that they do not actually know my interests.
And if they admit this, then how can they state that I am voting against my interests when they do not have knowledge of them?