They could set a threshold like 100k subs to get a contract.
They just don't want to because they think they can solve everything with AI.
You hit the nail on the head. IIRC compaines like google and tesla would lose money if the gov wasn't involved.
When was the last time google made a hit since search?
If that's what they're scared of they should make contracts with creators that protect both parties.
It shocks me how YT has so much $$$ and such poor business practice.
If you and I ran a business like YT did we'd be a laughing stock and sued to the shadow realm
Proof YT can fuck with your views and reach just like twitter did.
Sneako sued YT after they banned his channel and froze 200k in adsense.
Days later they updated their terms of service to say that they can retroactively TAKE $ from creators that aren't ad friendly.
What a coincidence.
Why these platforms can't just be up front and say who they want and who they don't want with clear rules is beyond me.
@Tfmonkey
It's not my place to tell another man how to manage his money and I hate when people do it to me, so I apologize.
I wasn't trying to make it seem like you didnt know what you were doing. I just assumed you didn't want to be bothered with it which is why I suggested it.
@Tfmonkey i beseech you, PLEASE get an accountant!
I know you said you don't want to fuck with deductions because you don't want to deal with the IRS.
But IMO you pay way too much in taxes to let that money go.
I had to replay that part twice when you said how much in taxes you paid to make sure I heard it right...
True, such a sad state of affairs.
The probliem is that kids, ESPECIALLY girls value their peer group >>> parents.
I've seen parents with the best of intentions fail because the system is so screwed.
The only solution I see is geo-maxxing or joining amish/orthodox jews.
@mathuis Trust me I see where your coming from but check out his conversation with Halsey and you see why I was disappointed.
I wish CHATGPT had an dev version.
An uncucked open-source program I could use offiine without giving my name and email out.
That way when they lobotomize a new version I could simply refuse it.
The subscription system saves you $ at first but overtime costs you more money and freedom.
I know devs need to eat too but I prefer paying for my software once.
Spot on, it's all in the implementation. Right now I doubt twitter has the resources to compete but it's definitely interesting to think about
I think it can and here's my thinking so far.
Elon said he wants twitter to be wechat for usa. Which means a payment platform is coming.
So considering they
1. have more brand recognition than OF
2. Already allow porn
3. don't go bankrupt
4. Hoes LOVE plausible deniability.
Twitter infuencer >> OF creator
I see a real possibility of them taking some of OF's marketshare.
Animations, memes, and philosophy.
ZERO TOLERANCE for:
TFM slander
LOW-IQ