>your covering up for Jewish Power
or
Refuse to admit the reality of it
No you just lack reading comprehension.
I just said:
"You can't do anything meaningful in media in America without Jews"
How is that covering for Jewish power?
America has LAWS against hate speech that could put Rumble in legal trouble if they violate hence the TOS.
So you can miss me with the Jewish copypastas anyone with eyes knows who's in charge.
>You can thank porn for that, and in particular the BBC genre of porn.
True but let's not forget hoes on social media going viral for saying that most guys are small.
Younger guys see this and it gets to them.
I remember one guy telling me how it was hard for him being short at 5" 10.
When I told him the average height of a man was 5" 9 and that 3% of the population were taller than 6" 2 he was dumbfounded.
mostly young) guys that are insecure about their dick size" are probably white guys.
Yes, but I have doubts about this BBC myth as I've even heard a black dude talk about this at UNI.
I doubt that every black dude is packing, I posit dick size is proportionate to your body
>Definitely not Indian guys, their self confidence is one of life's fascinating mysteries and wonders.
LOL I wouldn't be so sure but I can't confirm as I've never talked to one about it.
@BHG
>The government wastes money on all sorts of stupid shit.
Yes but not in the billions.
*dons tinfoil tophat* I believe the reason why the gov recently got so censorship happy and built this surveillance state is because they know that not everyone is going along with their nonsense.
>Let's not overestimate ourselves
I'm not I just look like it because most guys are demoralized.
Yes, because they HAVE to.
That's not rumble's rule its the government's rule.
Free speech is meant to protect people that criticize the government.
Not edgelords that want to proverbially yell fire in a movie theater or say death to the jews because they think its funny.
@BHG
> How many of us are willing to fight the US government for 20 years just to TWRA?
Enough for the secret service to write papers about the manosphere and waste billions of tax dollars building a surveillance apparatus to quell dissent.
I see your point theoretically but if everyone was so cucked why would they spend so much time/$$ spying on their citizens?
@UncleIroh I agree with you in principle but I've seen an concerning amount of (mostly young) guys that are insecure about their dick size.
This never made much sense to me so I looked it up on Wikipedia and I wanted to share what I found.
Alot of guys think that its over because they have a 5.5 incher not realizing thats the average dick size is
>an important source of pleasure for women is in being used.
True, can confirm.
@BHG Also TWRA is inevitable because the system is going bankrupt supporting women with all this free shit.
This is why we have all these nonsensical wars we can't afford and it's going to bite us in the ass.
In the long run we either take their rights away, or we get taken over and EVERYONE loses their rights.
There is no other way.
@BHG
>WRA is going to require the majority of men
This is demonstrably false and the Taliban proved this.
It doesn't take a majority of men it takes a unified front of a critical mass of men.
Why else do you think they have such a large surveillance apparatus?
I'll give you a hint, only 3% of colonists participated in the American Revolution.
@BHG
> Governors of states have more power than many of them are willing to wield,
Even if that is true, it still doesn't matter.
This is because as long as women vote there will be no meaningful change.
Women are the majority of voters and live longer and don't die in wars so you HAVE to take their rights away.
@BHG
3. Because we have a debt based monetary system that requires taxpayers to pay into.
This debt based monetary system was brought about to pay off debts from the welfare state.
The primary beneficiaries of welfare are women.
We're back where we started.
Do you now why #TWRA is the only way?
I've thought this through and there simply is no better solution.
You can't remove the welfare as long as women vote.
@BHG
>they need to be lied to or told the truth by a man who they want to fuck
Your heart's in the right place but this is just is just tiresome. It's like letting kids vote but we just have politicians hold up the candy they like.
We COULD, or we could just not let them vote because they clearly lack the maturity/mental stability to make an informed decision.
>If you can eliminate the welfare state, the birthrates don't matter.
Close but no cigar. You have remove both because...▶️
>It was posted on Reddit for reaction farming
Fair enough
>there isn't a group that loves police state and socialism more than women.
Weak men love it too, but here's a caveat: They go down with the ship.
I got into a debate with someone saying the collapse will hurt women and I disagreed.
In a collapse/military conquest the men ALWAYS bear the brunt of it.
Ex. In Ukraine the men were rounded up to be cannon fodder while the women just left and hopped on some new dick.
@Wopu WAY too generous.
Women should not vote AT ALL.
Men think about what's best for society and consider them in their vote.
Women do not build a damn thing in society and struggle with logical thinking and considering 2nd order consequences.
They are also more susceptible to social engineering/ manipulation due to their emotionality.
@Stahesh @sardonicsmile 😂 LOL that Mr Krabs meme gets me every time!
It's also why they get married in the 1st place.
This used to be common knowledge but 🤷♂️
@BHG
>There have been libertarian-ish governors elected in the USA in my lifetime
In post-civil war america the states can't really do much anyway.
#TWRA is the ONLY way because it was the way God intended.
Notice how in any prosperous society there are NO female leaders?
That's because the ones with female leaders got wiped out!
In a competitive environment feminism is the death of your country because male leadership is superior in every way. (Less mood swings, more logical etc.)
@BHG
>maybe the pro freedom right needs to unite behind candidates who make the ladies' panties moist.
The reason why this will never work is that the second they realize the candidate will reduce the welfare state they'll be dropped like a bad habit.
Remeber that feminism is only possible with the men's taxes and set asides to women.
In a true free marke this nonsense would never work and they know it.
@BHG I hate to burst your bubble but that's not going to happen.
The reason we go so hard with TWRA isn't just because of ending the welfare state. It's because:
1. Women have BIOLOGICAL imperative to be taken care of and because of this will NEVER choose freedom > security en masse.
2. Birthrates will plummet leading to demographic replacement even if they did vote for the right candidate.
3. Women in the workforce is terrible because it lowers wages and creates undue drama/stress
▶️
@UncleIroh I was just fucking around but I learned something new today:
"Bell's palsy
Facial paralysis resulting from dysfunction in the cranial nerve "
I had no idea this was a thing let alone a symptom.
So the blood clots cause nerve damage that can turn you into a steven hawking?
I thought I dodged a bullet but I was wrong. I dodged a tactical nuke lol
Animations, memes, and philosophy.
ZERO TOLERANCE for:
TFM slander
LOW-IQ