@shortstories Disagreed with you here men colaboration Is key to have function soyciety. You won't have that Is only a group of men Is Select to breed while The rest are dicards.
Maybe just maybe if TFM dream of hiperrealistic Robotic sex Dolls that can sastify The bunch men their sexual needs maybe we can create this poligamy soyciety you are talking about.
On a long enough timeline "bad research methodology" is a self-correcting problem.
They found that out in the USSR and Mao's China when reality failed to comply with their "science" and it ended with them stacking bodies of their own citizens tens of millions high.
@Based_Accelerationist @shortstories
Islam has been under a sustained NeoLib "reformation" psyop for decades, just like Orthodox Christianity has.
The only patriarchal religion that has been allowed to go unchallenged is Orthodox Judaism.
@shortstories Islam is doing fine, "Sheikh" is just a former English teacher who gained a little power in global homo Saudi Arabia.
In a traditional society, it's disrespectful to ask if the woman is a virgin. If she isn't, then she shouldn't be on the market in the first place and her family should be held accountable for omitting such an important detail. But from her perspective, as long as nobody knows, the best move is to stay quiet. But yeah, this guy failed Islam.
Here is what you should do when someone presents you a scientific journal article to back up a claim
If the article has a mean or standard deviation request the raw data that was used to calculate the mean or standard deviation
If they fail to present the raw data then tell them since the raw data from which the mean or standard deviation was calculated was not presented, I choose to ignore that article
You should do this for any articles that mention statistical significance but no raw data
That was interesting, but in the end, while I get your frustrations, it will go nowhere for all the reasons the poast dudes mentioned.
Data is a commodity and the information derived from it is a weapon. You can hide it, use it as a baseball bat on populations, or both.
The only way to get their raw data and methodology is to steal it or replicate it yourself.
Summary. Most human activities as well as many disciplines — from physics and biology to linguistics, finance, and computer science — follow a Pareto distribution instead of a “normal” Gaussian curve
https://hbr.org/2022/01/we-need-to-let-go-of-the-bell-curve
Most scientific journal articles
1 Do not publish raw data
2 Use statistics tests that are designed for normal distribution instead of pareto distribution
3 Do not prove there is a normal distribution with the raw data because they do not publish it
4 Do not trust them
Here is how a typical scientific journal study works
1 Choose a alpha value and if it will be a one or two tail t test
2 Collect data for two groups
3 Calculate mean, standard deviation and sample size for both groups
4 based on 1 & 3 decide if groups are statistically significantly different, PRESUMING they are both normally distributed
5 Never publish raw data showing they are normally distributed
This is sneaky because the normal distribution makes people look more "equal" than Pareto