@MasterSimper Your first priority is to avoid any problems like this. If that means nothing further can come of your encounter, then you might have to accept that. Outside of that situation, I would be upfront with any intentions you would have. OUTSIDE OF WORK, there is no reason to not just lay out what you are wanting. If a woman does not want what you want, she can let you know and you can go your separate ways. It saves everyone time.
@MasterSimper First off, this "sister group" is in the same employer, correct? This is going to be the first cause of concern if you have an interest in this woman. Which is too bad, because the other parts of the story tell me there is mutual interest.
Some employers have explicit prohibitions on fraternizing, and if that is the case with your employer, you cannot go further. There might be other policies to consider too which could put you in a bad situation.
@MasterSimper Yes. Fire away.
@MasterSimper Okay, what is your question?
@deprecated_ii I can see golf courses go out of business as one example.
@basedbagel You must have been one of those responsible people who worked as much as he could and paid off his debt at a reasonable or expedited rate. How dare you, you should be like other college students who cry about being victims of debt while maxing out debt to have the "college experience" and buy things they could not afford!
@basedbagel One possibility is that some of the student loans were reimbursed when they canceled one or more classes (happens often enough), where instead of taking that money and putting towards the loan, they use it for whatever bullshit they want in the moment.
Or it also could be a case where money being guaranteed for one thing frees you up to spend it elsewhere. For example, food stamps freeing up money you would have needed to spend on food.
Besides being a leftist propaganda piece about how 'muh insurrection' was the worst thing ever and smokescreening the actual fact that our government was hiding the truth in order to push a narrative, what else is this piece?
It is trying to lay groundwork for the government to be able to censor "disinformation," which is anything the government wants censored. And being a direct propaganda arm of the government, anything the faggots at NPR say must be true.
@WashedOutGundamPilot @nukie >Men cannot manage solitude, but women can
>Men are the ones who have a stronger desire to have children than women
What kind of bullshit am I reading? Women are the ones who CRAVE attention and cannot fathom what it would mean to not have their existences acknowledged (and men regularly experience this), and who are the ones who get baby rabies? Certainly not men.
@WashedOutGundamPilot The "proof" of that is a picture that does not even show the face of the girl.
@furgar >It is not carbs
Not carbs, but a specific carb. We put sugar/corn starch in so many of our foods, and not just the snack and dessert items. Just look at the label for a can of spaghetti sauce, you will see sugar as an ingredient.
A lot of the problems with added sugar stems from the whole "fat-free" phase when fat was demonized. Meanwhile, food producers added sugar in place of fat, making things worse as fat was never the problem.
@rohrkrepierer Those who are inferior often look for someone they perceive as inferior to them to punch down on to make themselves feel better. Incels are the not only people she sees as inferior, but are the newest punching bag thanks to the campaign to hate any man who might be sexually frustrated or not happy with the status quo of feminism and the dating market.
@Heil_Honkler @PinochetsCommieCopter This sort of thing should have been done for something far more consequential than pension reform of all things. But they are rioting because they are told they might need to wait a few more years to get money redistributed to them.
This is not giving the government themselves a pass, as they are guilty of a lot of corrupt and evil shit. I just want people more riled up over tyranny rather than entitlements.
@Tfmonkey Before it gets too far away from when daylight savings is still fresh in our minds, want to guess which president was a strong advocate for keeping daylight savings time (as in continuing the process of switching back and forth)? You only need one guess.
@furgar Easy to eliminate the last choice. 60 years old and a "university administrator." What use is he exactly?
I know why poast would eliminate him, but I think my reasons are adequate enough. Sorry, being old just means that you had your opportunity to live your life.
Looks like this will be my new home. Warning: I (probably) have Asperger's, so my be prepared for my autism to show through.
I don't think I am a right wing extremist, but I am sure anyone with low testosterone might think otherwise.