houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

@kaiservenom @Pain66 the same question you ask male incels should be asked to her: whom is she aiming at for relationships? She might not be able to compete to get the top percentage of men to commit to her, but she can certainly find a man who would commit to her (and she could still get a decent quality man).

Actual incels will report that they strike out no matter how low they go in terms of quality of woman.

@MasterSimper This sounds more like a family problem than a woman problem.

With that in mind, the first question you must know the answer to is this: do you want your sister as a part of your life? Is a relationship with your sister worth it?

Yes, some may say "but she is family!" You don't choose who is related to you, but you do choose whether they are worth having a relationship with. And I do not think severing any ties should be done on a whim. It should be done with proper merits.

@FinalDresdonation True, sometimes a competition can be turned around. Though what I am referring to is cases where victory is not considered achievable for one side. The will to fight on, even when you see that most likely you will lose. Having victory come out in spite of those odds is indeed a feat, but I do not see that as the sole reason that men still fight on when they are on the losing side of a competition.

@Zeb Yes. I was just getting to that point, and you are right. Why take the risk to your own life and fight when you can just safely surrender and know that you will not die as a result? The men of course do not have this option, so it makes far more sense for them to fight on against the harshest odds.

I see this as another critical aspect of why men's sports are more popular than women's sports. It is not just men being more capable in their physicality. They are also far more likely to bring out their best abilities for the entire game, even in a one sided match where everyone can see who will win. It is far less enjoyable to watch a match where one side stops even trying in the middle of the event.

Speaking of which, I should also mention that the men in this situation would have nothing to lose by fighting, because they are probably going to die anyways. Better to fight as hard as you can if you have nothing lose. Women who would do the same would have something to lose, so it makes sense for them to shut down even trying.

When applied to less violent competitions such as sports, we are going to see these traits play out even when there is no threat of death. It is just instinct.

My guess to why this happens is due to epigenetics taking place. In the event of a competition, the men need to still fight on against their enemies in order to save as many of their own as possible, and even when losing they can still make a difference in the overall survival of their own side.

Women, on the other hand, would have no need for this response, as they would most likely survive as the spoils of war for the victorious opponents, unlike the men who would not be spared.

We all know the meme of high school boys being able to beat the national women's team in a sports match. Anyone who is not a moron understands that men are faster and stronger than women, so it is no surprise the boys win every time.

But there is another major difference I have observed between boys and girls playing sports. In a one sided match, the boys on the losing side will still square up their best effort until the end. When this happens in a girls' game, the losing side just gives up.

@furgar Link for reference: https://genesiustimes.com/new-chicago-mayor-vows-to-fix-all-the-damage-done-by-the-last-republican-mayor-in-1931/

@furgar Careful for what you see. This is clearly satire, as I just looked it up and found the exact thing on a self described joke news site.

However, it does bring up a good point that Chicago sucks and Democrats have been in charge for so long that Republicans can in no way be the reason for the failures of the city.

@FinalDresdonation >Destiny
>masculine

Now that is a good one! Unfortunately with this being Reddit, I cannot assume this was a clever shitpost but rather that the poster was being completely serious.

@furgar It is because their highest imperative is that the women get to choose whether or not a baby lives or dies. They lament forced abortions in China because it goes against the choices of the woman, not once having any sorrow for the baby that dies.

@PonyPanda you are correct, but it is the sentiment that matters here. They still only care about women getting to do whatever they want regardless of whether or not others are harmed or it is immoral.

@furgar How much do you want to bet a lot of the comments are "I am not a Republican, but my dad is one and he said he was fed up with Trump being such an embarrassment to our country and the world."

I would bet this because every other stupid post on r/AskReddit has examples of "I am not X but I know someone who is."

Not only that, but I am sure many of them are "fellow Republicans" who are just fishing for fake internet points.

@theFlow @Tfmonkey I may have to look at exactly what these "positive male influences" are, because I suspect they are the blue-pilled to the core. Though that would be a pretty safe bet, since they do not want men leaving the plantation.

@Tfmonkey That's right, you are Carl from Aqua Teen Hunger Force! Clever of you saying that you live in California, when we all know Carl lives in New Jersey! You almost threw me off your trail. But little by little, the truth could no longer be denied.

I think I cracked the code with you @Tfmonkey. You can no longer hide your true identity. Talking about your love of flip flops and comfortable clothes? Your mention of a having too much fat around the midsection? Your degenerate lifestyle?

This is you. Don't deny it. You know I am right.