houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

@sardonicsmile I am confused. How exactly are these two women fighting over custody? Were they a lesbian couple? Or was there some other dumpster fire level of dysfunction going on that I am not aware of?

@BHG @basedbagel Also, it is a glaring issue that we need to play the emotional game of picking a more "attractive" candidate to appeal to women. This shows that we cannot win them over with logic, which means we cannot address other issues unless we cater to their whims at every single turn. This means we are at best slow to solve problems. But usually it means we do not solve any problems at all.

The problem I see is that @BHG is trying to figure out a way to win within the current rule set while @basedbagel points out that the current rule set is rigged against being able to actually solve the problem. You have to bend over backwards too much just to get inferior results when you confine yourself to the rigged rule set.

@sj_zero Also, some theories get the well poisoned with additional nonsensical parts so that way it can be "debunked" by the establishment media. They only "debunk" the added crazy parts while not addressing any reasonable parts. That way when someone searches for a conspiracy theory, it leads to "it was debunked" links. The news later loosely references these "debunkings" loosely, hoping you do not look any deeper than their own sources.

@iboughtcryptowhoops This is one example where appearances can be deceiving. What I mean is this couple in the video, not the subject of the video.

When I first saw these two, my assumption was that the man would have the most soyed out politics imaginable. But I was quite wrong. And I am glad to be wrong in cases like these.

@dave They have a season 2? I was not aware that they had a real audience for that dumpster fire of a show.

@basedbagel @theFlow Another moral: anyone who cares about the well-being of a fictional character over that of a real person should not be taken seriously (assuming the real life person is not a horrible person).

@dickflatteningenthusiast I have a theory that it is being pushed with the powers that be knowing it does not and will not work long term, seeing it as an opportunity to force everyone into "smart cities" and defacto ending car ownership without outright banning it.

That way they can say "we did not force you to get rid if your car" while they pushed for the outcome of car removal.

@theFlow If I was in that position, I would most likely just find another source of income. It is too big of a risk to dox yourself, since most likely you have been anonymous for a reason.

@Wolffkran This "joke" does not work as a joke when it is just women hating on men without having any hint of irony. Humor should have an element of truth, but there needs to be a distinction between the "humor" and the unironic thoughts that man-hating women like this have.

@PNS >just because someone is sitting at their desk for 12 hours does not mean you are getting 12 hours of productivity

I am also willing to bet she would not want to collect the productivity data for men and women either. That would not help her case either.

So where is this socialization gap? It does not really exist. Rather, it is just a retarded rationalization by feminists stupid enough to think that strength differences are a result of socialization.

But if you only ever went through life where you can be placed in positions you never should have been in due to state backed gender quotas, it is that surprising that they would think this would apply to biological differences?

Anyone who knows anyone with daughters knows that girls have roughly the same amount of opportunities to participate in sports. Sure, not all the same sports, but girls are provided with the same opportunities to engage in physical activities as boys.

And it is not as if most parents care that much if their children are the best athletes ever. Rather, they just want to give them opportunities to exercise, compete and have fun.

So sure, the woman with a job title can be referred to as such. But if she cannot do the job, then is she really an engineer? Obviously not.

So when we apply this same mindset to other areas, many women will think that they can socially assert other things to become reality.

But if you do not realize that social assertions can only create illusions, you can believe idiotic things like women being just as strong as men, but men are socially conditioned to do sports more than women.