@EssentialUtinsil Yes, you should not have kids because you might have moments in your life that involve difficult situations. Nevermind that every aspect of life is going to have challenges and hardships, this specific scenario is just too hard for anyone to deal with!
Screw that noise. Not every day is going to be easy. But far more people have been sad that they did not have kids than those who were sad that they did.
@sardonicsmile I don't see how this needs to be a conflict. You can just buy both crunchy and smooth peanut butter, and each can have their own. It's not like peanut butter goes bad quickly or takes up that much space.
Though yes, the real problem is that he somehow does not have the stones to tell his wife that he is going to have crunchy peanut butter because he wants to have it. Or he is convincing himself out of it when she might not even care thar much.
One common example of this is women with their dating expectations. "He should make 500k a year, be at least 6 feet, good looking, and accept me as I as a single mom with 3 kids."
It is simply a sign of stupidity to not be able to have and accept a realistic assessment of what you should be able to attain, not live in delusion.
How many people have you come across that have unrealistic expectations? And how many of those people with unrealistic expectations have low intelligence?
It seems obvious when I mention it, but I think it is a missing piece in the discussion of those who have unrealistic expectations. They are stupid, plain and simple.
Among the many pieces of propaganda by the LGBT, the "we just want to get married" apparently never really took off even when the Supreme Court just invented the "right" for them to be married in spite of many states voting against it (even California of all states in 2008).
https://news.gallup.com/poll/329975/one-lgbt-americans-married-sex-spouse.aspx
@Fullmetal2255 I would give him the benefit of the doubt if not for the fact that he said "it made sense" to implement it in this way. And the fact that he seems to be aware of the performance issues but still defends it (assuming this is real and not a troll).
@Fullmetal2255 >I'm a React developer so it only made sense
In the field of software engineering, one important part of your job is to not only know if something can technically be done, but also IF it should be done.
@Tfmonkey The big problem with many libertarians is that they think they can implement their policies in any order and cheer even when they get open borders without realizing that having open borders means they will lose any possibility of cutting welfare. "Don't worry, we are working on that problem too!"
That is where the retardation is with many libertarians and the Libertarian party.
@Tfmonkey regarding the Libertarian party, you are correct that they are generally useless and often counterproductive. But with their own words, I have seen them claim to be cutting welfare spending and removing tax dollars from the healthcare system. But since they are only empty words, it is functionally the same thing as them being opposed to cutting that kind of spending.
Something I observed happened to me again. I had eaten a lot of food over 2 days, and the very next day my body stopped giving me hunger signals. It was the opposite of starvation mode (that same term inappropriately used by many who are obese). It was a forced fasting mode.
At least I know that I should not have to worry about gaining too much weight, since my body will simply say "slow down before you get fat!"
@yockeypuck @grey >the leaders [of the trucker convoy] who had funds frozen because they came from criminal channels inside Russia
This is a new one. Fun fact: you can just post lies on Reddit, and it is not against the law. Even if you are a state actor posting this sort of thing on all your sock puppet accounts, as long as you are not caught you set the narrative for everyone foolish enough to trust comments on Reddit.
@sardonicsmile Perhaps we need to have a collapse and have some readjustment. But I guarantee it will not be pleasant, and women like this will soon realize that the consequences of a lack of investment by men will mean hard times. Eventually we will rebalance to the system where either men are scarce (thus true harems being common) or heavily enforced monogamy. Either way, the feminist system will be necessarily pushed out of the way for a system that can actually function.
Looks like this will be my new home. Warning: I (probably) have Asperger's, so my be prepared for my autism to show through.
I don't think I am a right wing extremist, but I am sure anyone with low testosterone might think otherwise.