houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

And then we add war on top of all that. I do not mean civil war (though that may come) but a conventional war.

In the past, men by and large had motivation to fight, even if much of it was propped up by our government lying to them about the justification for the war. Men back then had a strong motivation to fight: their families.

This applies even to bachelors, who would have extended family they would care for or future aspirations to have a family.

And why does this happen? Because women have become unmarriageable from a combination of policies and loosened social pressures. There are just far too many women who are far too risky of a prospect to start a family with, so there is no motivation to even try for the men.

But given the number of fields of work that are critically necessary for a society to function, this could really become disastrous if the number of men who just gave up reaches critical mass.

If men do not have a strong motivator to go out there and achieve something, many of them will opt for a more minimal sustenance approach. Just work hard enough to support themselves, and little more than that. Men who live like this can do any job, even low paying or low hour jobs. After all, if they are not even caring about impressing women, why work harder than you have to?

Men are the ones who are most screwed over by this destruction, as the government favors women in many aspects of life. Sure, you can screw over men as a whole and still have things operating for a time, but the slow decay will start to set in. We already see men less motivated to get married and have a family. Sure, women can technically have a family without a man present, but this also does not make for a functional society. Men are critically necessary for society to actually function.

I don't think that the powers that be thought through some of the long term consequences of the decisions that they made in destroying the family unit. Whether each aspect of the destruction was deliberate or unintentional, those in power should realize that their policies are destroying families (whether it is biased family courts/divorce laws or welfare policies).

The destruction of the family will mean the downfall of a functional society and instable government.

@VeganMGTOW @Chimi_Chuang_Tzu @RodrickSage Getting the vaxx is probably not going to be a death sentence for most people. I think there is going to be a significant enough number of people with adverse affects and/or death down the line (as well as the numbers of people who already had that happen).

Ever since they said "you should still get vaccinated" even if you already got Covid, that should have been a sign that something was wrong.

@sardonicsmile Anyone who has been around children knows that they most certainly are impressionable and will not be coming up with as many thoughts "independently" as shills will claim. This is especially true with very young children.

From my own personal experience, I was influencing one of my nieces in the things she said from just a long weekend of time together. Children absorb much of what they observe, more than you would think. And groomers know this very well.

Since NPR has been a good barometer for whatever the government wants people to think (because it really just is the government itself, let's not kid ourselves with their supposed "independence"), I do see this as a "we are starting to back down at this point," and I will take any sign as a good one.

They can always push messaging to their midwit audience that "Covid is really bad guys!" once more, but they are at the very least hedging their bets for now.

On my reconnaissance listening to the libtard propaganda outlet NPR, I heard something that sounded like good news. They were prefacing the reports on "the new strain" as not being as bad as previously thought by "the experts."

This is good news not because I take what government propaganda says at face value, but rather that maybe the powers that be are reconsidering their plans to try and do the lockdowns and mandates again. That is the good news, not the actual bullshit news itself.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @nierenstein And another thing, with the second post, a woman can get all the "practice" she needs with her husband. So the whore justification is not warranted. Rather, it is a post hoc rationalization in attempt to excuse her sleeping around.

Also, plenty of men are most likely not going to be receiving any benefit from her "experience," especially if she is unwilling to be enthusiastic in high enough frequency.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @nierenstein >It's so funny when easy women think having lots of sex makes them good at it.

I see projection at work on the women's part in cases like this. A woman may need a man to climb the learning curve to make her optimally satisfied, but for a man, it is quite easy for him to get pleasure out of sex, making "practice" for his sake mostly unnecessary. There might be some learning she can do to improve things, but it is really not all that critical.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @PunishedD The inverse for a man is the type that gives women money on OnlyFans or Twitch chats. He is providing resources for a woman who is not reciprocating with sexual access.

When we go back to what works with marriage being the package that gives BOTH men and women what they want, things work better. And by marriage, I don't mean the hellscape that is modern marriage with current divorce laws and other crap. I mean "till death do us part" to the letter.

@WashedOutGundamPilot @PunishedD >never ONCE blaming the women’s selection of men who have no interest in them beyond their wet hole

This is the key. There is a reason we refer to women and men in their respective "gatekeeper" roles. Women are supposed to be more picky when it comes to sex precisely so that they do not get pumped and dumped. Unfortunately, many women forget that pickiness should be about if a man commits and not if he gives her the tingles.

@Hoss Fahrenheit's 100 degrees was supposed to be the healthy human body temperature, and I recall 0 degrees has something to do with salt and ice (I forget exactly). So Fahrenheit is not just random, and it is indeed more practical for humans to understand quickly.

@deprecated_ii >aced honors physics
>struggles with algebra

You can tell this journalist was also bad at math, because anyone who took physics would know that you absolutely need to know how algebra works if you are going to do anything with physics. Even if you are doing physics using calculus, you still need algebra to do that.

So yes, cheating and/or bad high schools are likely.

@deprecated_ii I knew a foreign student at my college who claimed he wanted to be an engineer. But wow, his math skills were abysmal. He could barely manage to pass a math class that was at the level of my 7th to 8th grade algebra.

No idea if he managed to make it through school. But I really doubt he did. I just don't know how he would possibly manage once he had to do some actually difficult math.