shortstories @[email protected]

Article Title

Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7505114/

Being an article Title does not make a statement true nor false

@RodrickSage

Disagree

everyone should work together to hate the kike religion

https://www.mgtow.tv/watch/joker-women-are-not-funny_Om5hkgatEa9HrHv.html

@fknretardlol

I should have worded the post better

@fknretardlol

I am not asking if most Southeast Asian women look like kikes

I am asking if the woman in the video who looks southeast Asian also looks like a kike

To those who believe there is such a thing as a kike face

Can a face look like a kike's face and a Southeeast Asian woman's face at the same time

Volume of Nose divided by size of head compared with typical value for Southeast Asian Goyim

Ears?

Forehead?

Lips?

https://www.mgtow.tv/watch/everyone-must-take-experimental-shots-for-your-freedom_AyRiLIO8pBKWkKQ.html/list/affImjPlBOmHrD6

Video Title

Everyone Must Take Experimental Shots For Your Freedom

Channel
Just pissed you off

Platform
MGTOW dot TV

https://www.mgtow.tv/watch/a-look-at-the-dogpill_8xEblmXRuHrIFlh.html/list/BhrbiQU7q78ppcw

Video Title

A Look At The DogPill

Channel

VBLAKEROSE

Platform

MGTOW dot TV

https://www.mgtow.tv/watch/canada-karen-is-thrown-off-the-bus-after-spitting-on-a-man-039-s-face_oMukuvF1logji4R.html

Video Title

Canada: Karen is thrown off the bus after spitting on a man's face.

Channel

Eren Kruger

Platform

MGTOW dot TV

@agaperealm @nomebullyyou

#TransvestigateEinstein

@agaperealm @nomebullyyou

The being that is called Einstein's wife

I am not presuming Einstein's gender

@pepsi_man @JollyWizard @TrevorGoodchild

Some spokesperson for Answers in Genesis said that Christians who majored in or perhaps were professors in hard sciences like physics or chemistry were more likely to believe in Young Earth Creation than Pastors who attended seminary for their degree instead or perhaps seminary professors

I wish I could find a link on their website describing this supposed study

@pepsi_man @TrevorGoodchild

Variations in the 14
C/12
C ratio in the atmosphere, both geographically and over time
Isotopic fractionation
Variations in the 14
C/12
C ratio in different parts of the reservoir
Contamination

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating_considerations

Four categories of errors in carbon dating according to wikipedia

@pepsi_man @TrevorGoodchild

The variation in the 14
C/12
C ratio in different parts of the carbon exchange reservoir means that a straightforward calculation of the age of a sample based on the amount of 14
C it contains will often give an incorrect result. There are several other possible sources of error that need to be considered. The errors are of four general types:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating_considerations

@TrevorGoodchild @pepsi_man

For example an object could have had some lead in it that was already there and did not come from Uranium as it's starting point

You can not really know how much lead it started with and how much Uranium unless you know what it was like in the initial condition it was formed

And if you witnessed it in the initial condition it was formed then you would already know how old it was from when it was formed and not need a dating method to date it

@TrevorGoodchild @pepsi_man

If matter was not created out of nowhere then something that once had a certain percent of Uranium had to exist before it had that certain percent so if you assumed it started 100% Uranium and turned to lead then you could guess a date but if it was 100% Uranium then it must have been something before it was 100% Uranium and something before that and so on

Also you could start at some other % Uranium

It is very arbitrary because you do not know the starting point

@TrevorGoodchild @pepsi_man

Radiometric dating only works if you know the starting conditions

I find Carbon dating less problematic in it's assumptions because you can assume a certain amount of carbon isotopes in the atmosphere being the same in the past as today but I did not say that it is not problematic

Other dating methods are more problematic in my opinion

Let's say you have Uranium turn to lead and try to find the date by the ratio of Uranium to Lead

What was it before 100% Uranium

@Scubbie @Tfmonkey

I am not saying we need to have faith in something

I am saying we need to abandon faith in money and abandon faith in Jews as a society for things to get better

@nomebullyyou

The object that is moving in the reference frame will be shrunk in the direction it is moving

If the race track is moving underneath a racer the race track will be shorter & so it will take less time to run the race

If the race track is stationary and the racer is moving then the track will get longer & it will take more time to run the race

If there is say a spiked wall a certain distance after the finish line then the racer might die in one reference frame and live in another

@nomebullyyou

I am not denying that 2 different clocks can have 2 different changes in time value between the same two different events

But the way it was dealt with in calculations were made in the special theory of relativity as I understand are absurd

Essentially they claim that the speed of light is the same in all reference frames & that objects get smaller or bigger so that travel time gets larger or smaller while traveling at the same speed

This change in length leads to absurdities