Show newer

1. Christianity and anarcho-capitalism are compatible with one another.

2. Nationalism, which is different from nation-statism, is perfectly compatible with Christian anarcho-capitalism

4. “Racial realism,” anti-feminism, and libertarian “patriarchalism” will be a big part of this group, and while these views are politically incorrect and not approved by the Establishment and the political elite, these views are compatible with libertarianism

6. Secession

web.archive.org/web/2015091822

However, by far the most important and relevant “conspiracy theory” involves alleged efforts by global elites to create a one-world oligarchical dictatorship under the guise of a “New World Order.” The resemblance of this theory to the claims of the left-wing anti-globalization movement are striking.

web.archive.org/web/2015091822

Is “Conspiracy Populism” the Way Beyond Left and Right?

@jew @Tfmonkey

youtube.com/watch?v=XUM1S9MZPr

DesTiny on his Open Relationship & being Bi on Jesse Lee Peterson’s Show

Tea Clips

Youtube

I heard the Chinese like the jews and even have monuments and statues dedicated to their communist founders 😏

@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot

If a sovereign can not break rules then one sovereign can not prosecute another sovereign for war crimes nor would there be wars between one sovereign and another sovereign in response to rules that one sovereign said the other sovereign broke

@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot

"In international relations theory, the concept of anarchy is the idea that the world lacks any supreme authority or sovereignty"

"International relations generally does not understand "anarchy" as signifying a world in chaos, disorder, or conflict; rather, it is possible for ordered relations between states to be maintained in an anarchic international system.[1]"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy_

@koropokkur @Humpleupagus @MasterSimper @freepatriot

If a sovereign can not break rules then how can one sovereign punish another sovereign for breaking rules without a worldwide government?

Is it legal for the one sovereign to punish the other sovereign?

If it is not legal then you have international anarchy

If it is legal for one sovereign to punish another sovereign for breaking rules then a sovereign can break rules

If you said that the government was wiretapping your phone in 1999, everybody would have called you a nutjob.

Now if you say that the government is wiretapping your phone, no one cares.

How can Americans sleep at night now or look in a mirror without feeling disgusted and ashamed?

lunaticoutpost.com/

@Humpleupagus @freepatriot @MasterSimper

Anomie is the absence of laws
Anarchy is the absence of rulers

Rulers make excuses for breaking rules by maintaining a monopoly on breaking the rules that they say other people should keep

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.