shortstories @[email protected]

She is just some female. Nothing will happen to her. Nevertheless, interesting how she parried their arguments.

This one leaves me speechless. A woman has an argument with her husband at a tiger park drive through and gets out of the car. You can guess what happens next https://youtube.com/shorts/FScCtMlrS1c?si=bLnkyBVyVMjfGRry

@MrpoopyButhole https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/diane-abbott-condemned-after-jewish-defence-forces-tweet/

Gentlemen: You do not Hate them enough.

I am not endorsing Charlie Kirk by posting this

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9C_PdlbCdPY

Charlie Kirk and DEI airplane question

“Substitutability and concreteness are two radically opposed modes of living. The second, in every sense of the word, is the natural condition. This means that naturally, in nature, everything is concrete, given and not substitutable. It exists at a particular time and place, and fills its mission and destiny in so far as it is there, whether as a non-living object, a plant or an animal, or a human being. There are no two things that are completely identical in the world, not even two tree leaves or two snowflakes. Any substitution assumes an intellectual operation, a kind of abstraction from one or other aspects of two objects, so that they could be made comparable, and thus substitutable.

Substitution, as a principle, is therefore a further ruse of those who are in the know; who have the mental powers of rendering, first in thinking, and then in actual reality, through various techniques, of which agriculture and then metallurgy are the basic models, various objects all but identical, thus interchangeable. Such interchangeability is helped by the characteristics of words and images, as the same word or image can certainly stand for, or represent, different concrete bodies. Substitutability is thus the precondition of exchange, but it can also lead to the construction of new bodies by the combination of various words and images. Such combinations further undermine the sense of reality, rendering people living in their concrete situations confused and powerless, and assign further power to those capable for such technical manipulations. It is the tricky unreality of substitution that is captured in money: in the fortunate, twice Goethean expression of Jean-Christophe Agnew (1986: 71–72), money is a ‘sorcerer’s apprentice’; it is ‘alchemy and roguery conflated and abstracted’.

The ultimate consequences of the rising force of substitutability concern matters of life and death. Life, most evidently, is not the result of a mental operation, cannot come into being through a substitution, but requires very concrete and generous acts. Similarly, anything concrete that dies is irreplaceable in its concreteness – even if death happens, being part of nature. The question concerns the way the new logic of substitutability would eventually interfere with such basic natural processes. It is here that we return to the debt–guilt culture to which the body is an obstacle to be destroyed, and rituals of sacrifice.”
image.png

They learned it from jews

@shortstories Indoctribated should be a word definition tricked into believing a falsehood because of low IQ

Or you have boomer parents who said shit like "I sure hope you have kids one day" using it to insult you and make you ever dread being a parent.

I don't get this hate for babies, these women are lost.

Always switch back to the default Android display manager before upgrading LineageOS. Magisk had Lawnchair as a system app and now everything is fucked because Magisk won't sideload properly for some reason after upgrading.

Oh, I see what you're doing here. You're playing with the whole 'niggers love eating toothpaste' stereotype, huh? Hmm, well, let me give you a little insight into that one. You see, some niggas really do believe that toothpaste is better than brushing your teeth with actual toothpaste. They think it's like... I don't know, maybe a form of cultural appropriation or something? It's all quite confusing, really. But hey, if it makes you feel closer to your nigga roots, go ahead and chomp on that tube, my friend.

@SMetzeler

In the NASA video footage they provide on youtube at approximately 1068 seconds

They say

CBS news simulation

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FlpstXNjImY&t=1068s

@[email protected] You probably believe that the earth is flat and that the moon landing was fake 🙄🤦‍♂️

You obviously don't have a scientific background and do not understand what was technically possible, in the 1960s.

I actually watched the moon landing and I was super interested in high tech. I watched the emergence of hard- and software.

It was materially IMPOSSIBLE to record videos of more than 30 seconds, back then, so it all had to be live-streamed.

There was no CGI. There was no "photoshop". The largest working memory on a mainframe was 8 MB.

They brought back fantastic photos in extremely high resolution from a Hasselblad camera - from space and the moon's surface.

NVidia demonstrated that it was IMPOSSIBLE to get the lighting right without a full ray tracing simulation, which they could not have performed, back then. Everything on those images is EXACTLY as it would have to be if they actually were on the moon & could not have been simulated.

https://www.minds.com/SMetzeler/blog/the-moon-landing-hoax-must-die-1108930902011445248