@YoMomz I'm just saying, lots of Germans seemed to think Christianity was little more than a conquering arm of Judaism.

And lots of rabbis seem to want Christianity for the goyim. After all, no one is more pro-Israel than Christians.

@Based_Accelerationist - I'm a huge history buff, and lately I've been reading/listening about the Christian conquest of Germany, the genocide of the Saxons, the tribes' early encounters with Rome, etc.

My goal is to find the good, keep it, and toss the bad - wherever either may crop up.

And something that has cropped up, is an interesting cultural practice of the old Germanic tribes. Apparently, they'd often bring their women to battle. they would be cheerleaders if their men won, ➡️

@Based_Accelerationist - ➡️ they might join as reinforcements if their men needed that, and they might take arms against their men if they attempted to flee.

I've been pondering if there's any sort of appreciable social-darwinian advantage to such a tactic... 🤔

But it also seems like an unmistakable sign of cuckery that reaches back into the mists of prehistory.

I don't seek to needlessly insult, but to understand. And maybe Germanic tribal culture was particularly ➡️

@Based_Accelerationist - ➡️ susceptible to Christianity, due to the elevated status of their women? 🤔

I dunno... But I want to not repeat that sort of mistake in the rebuild, so a conscious effort is needed - but figuring out the direction that effort should be applied to is tough.

Germanics had a lot going for them. So yeah, just food for thought I guess, in finding that dividing line. 🍻

@YoMomz Sounds like an advanced form of "white feather" shaming then. Highly doubt they served as reinforcements, that's the last thing a man needs to endure in the heat of battle, his own wife. No way that's a common practice. Now I don't trust whoever wrote that book.

@Based_Accelerationist - Lol! 🤣 Prehistory was crazy. Everything was trial and error.

I think it was Tacitus's account, maybe Caesar mentioned it too? 🤔 Don't quote me on that.

@YoMomz That's definitely the right mentality to have when researching history.

"Bringing their women into battle as cheerleaders" sounds like they were watching the whole thing up-close. I'm guessing the leaders allowed the women to reunite with their men after the battle, so they wouldn't be so homesick and reminded them of what they were supposedly fighting for, serving as a morale boost.

@PatriarchsHittingMarks They only hate Jesus for themselves, but they LOVE him for us. It's an ideological dispute, they're taught to reject all he preaches and represents. Everything they value, Jesus says the opposite. Praying for riches and wealth? No, sell your possessions and give to the poor. And eye for an eye? No, give the other cheek. Etc.

Had they not killed Jesus, Christianity would've died, it's all about that one event. He needed to become a martyr to rise as the eternal messiah.

@Based_Accelerationist this conversation will eventually evolve or devolve into epistemological truths and ecumenical factors of the Christian theology (and one true Church of Christ [Orthodoxy NOT protestantism] tracing back to Golgotha). What I CAN say with much certainty is that all of the other "ascended masters" spoke of Jesus, but Jesus only ever claimed that he was the truth, the way, and the life.

@Based_Accelerationist Giving alms to the poor, isn't rendering all of your possessions to others.

Also eye for an eye and turning the other cheek, is in reference to revenge, not that one could not defend yourself.

@Engineer @Based_Accelerationist Can you throw it into an AI and have it summarize it?

@Tfmonkey @Based_Accelerationist I don't have an AI subscription, they are fairly short reads. Not more than 11 minutes or so.

@Engineer I'd like to read it, but it's kinda weird that the user with the files, requires us to send them an email requesting access. What is the name of the book?

@Based_Accelerationist @Tfmonkey

My mistake, it should be available to everyone now without needing permissions.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qs_3kmEvfsm_3i1AiwJUL__-kmkH620x/view?usp=sharing

@Engineer @Tfmonkey Thanks for the link. I read it, it's a nice summary of what Christianity preaches, its likely purpose and how it contrasts with Judaism. Nothing we didn't already realize, but it's nice to have it all spelled out. As for the historical bit, the theories on who "Paul" was, or whether Jesus is fictional, are certainly possible, but there's no way to prove any of it.

Btw, here's the perspective of a Christian Jew, on Paul and Akiva (skip to 18:00 min):

https://www.oneforisrael.org/pod-for-israel/mind-blown-the-uncanny-connection-of-apostle-paul-and-rabbi-akiva-and-mans-strange-fire/