Uncle Iroh ☑️ @[email protected]

@shortstories

I make 2 exceptions: women should be able to have female doctors, and men should always have female dentists.

I don't want some dude shoving his fat fingers in my mouth (gay!!), and I want to feel the soft crush of female tiddies against me when they lean in to do their thang.

Female dentist tiddies FTW baby!!

@shortstories

Sauce: am Gen-X. We're way more based than Millennials and Boomers, present company excluded.

@Tfmonkey

Big fan of AA's analysis here. He doesn't explicitly make the claim that the BoomerCon vote is majority women, but I agree that it must necessarily split that way demographically.

His view is basically accelerationist. He wanted the voting public to hand Labour such an enormous victory that:

1. Conservatives would be destroyed forever

2. Labour would have no room to blame anyone else when they inevitably fuck up.

3. The kayfabe of British uniparty politics is destroyed forever.

@shortstories @YoMomz

> I think they simply should admit that they do not know what they are doing

Agreed!! That's the consequence of inference, not deduction.

Check out the TOE podcast (Theories of Everything) by Curt Jaimungal on youtube, and in particular those that feature pan-psychist scientists or Donald Hoffman, I promise you'll have a lot of fun diving into that rabbit hole.

It's nice to be able to talk with people here who appreciate this stuff.

@shortstories @YoMomz

That's an inference, not a deduction. Pure speculation.

That doesn't mean that the statisitical methods used in calculation are incorrect.

Their inferencea are still materialist-bound, but many scientists are now becoming more open to inferences that have to NECESSARILY include ontology, metaphysics and epistemology as they hit the limits of understanding.

More and more consciousness is playing a part in hypotheses. Personally I find this development fascinating.

@shortstories @YoMomz

Yeah, that's bullshit.

Blame the corruption, not the tool.

@shortstories @YoMomz

That's what astrophysicists, cosmologists and theoretical physicists do. They actually use statistical methods correctly because their fields often lack direct testability.

And more than a few times they have been proven correct.

@shortstories @YoMomz

Sure. Neither Fisher nor Bayes was around in Newtons time.

It doesn't mean that frequentist or Bayesian statistics are bullshit. They are useful tools that Newton would have used if they were around in his time.

Statistics is used to confirm or refute hypotheses. For example, Newton might have used statistical methods to analyze data from his experiments to determine whether the results were consistent with the predictions of his laws.

@shortstories @YoMomz

Consumer Price Index. Just go and look it up, he's talked about it a ton.

@shortstories @YoMomz

Dude, you need to stop the "X person didn't actually exist" bullshit. It's not doing you any favors.

Newton existed, and he was a legit MGTOW genius.

@shortstories @YoMomz

That's dishonest whichever way you look at it, but it doesn't stop there.

Definition: The scientific method is a systematic approach to discovering and understanding the natural world through observation, experimentation, and theoretical explanation.

All of that has been gamed and is well documented. Eric Weinstein talks about this alot.

e.g. He and his wife's work on statisitcal economics proves the lie about CPI fuckery. It's all ideological.

@shortstories

This is a little different. As far as I'm aware, this is the one of the first mainstream forays into male-waifu relationships.

@shortstories @YoMomz

The big problem here is suppression of results. How much is being deliberately withheld?

Peer review and once-respected publishers like Nature are now captured and compromised.

Biology is now not only under a national security blanket, it's also ideologically captured and politically weaponized against domestic populations.

It's all asshoe. The way I see it, our only hope is that BRICS defeats this bullshit and their scientists publish suppressed science.

@shortstories @YoMomz

I'd guess not.

The bill for that is going to paid one way or another.

#TWRA

@shortstories @YoMomz

Computational bioinformatics and gentic analysis is an area where AI is actually useful.

Human analysis cannot compare to what's possible with narrow AI. It has the advantage of being able to recognize patterns and perform variant detection in information-dense data which makes it perfect for that field.

@shortstories @YoMomz

Back then, we still had the concept of junk DNA which essentially discounted large sections of DNA as redundant based on nothing more than a lack of understanding.

We've now discarded that idea since coming to the understanding that DNA is more informationally dense than we had thought. Junk DNA is bullshit.

@RoninGrey

Glad to help. I'll be watching it too.

@Based_Accelerationist @Zeb

Also, on your specific point about restoring the balance, this is also inevitable. I see no future that does not incur pain and bloodshed. The bill must be paid and no family can escape unscathed.

When you fuck with the ground ontology of what it means to be a man, woman, child, or family, this outcome is inevitable.

If we get to the point where our disagreements come down to men arguing about which patriarchal system is best, that's a big fucking W in my book.

@RadiumLE85

As one of the commenters says, where's the #MeToo for men accused of false allegations?

In our lifetimes, we're going to see a male version of it that sweeps the Western world, guaranteed.

@YoMomz

It's a slowburn genocide at this point.