Show newer

@fal1026 @basedbagel @shortstories Which part of what I said was false? He made disparaging remarks to people with a different philosophical view to him and is hypocritical because he can't uphold what he espouses to his followers. However, this does not mean I want him cancelled as he can freely express himself howsoever he wants.

This doesn't mean I'm compelled to agree with everything he says as it defeats the purpose of free flowing discourse. Tell me more about your understanding of him.

@fal1026 @basedbagel @shortstories How can Peterson be taken seriously when he claimed, notwithstanding his regretful criticism, that subscribers of MGTOW were "pathetic weasels." This "Paragon of Intellect" can't uphold his own principles that he prescribes to his followers - Rules 2 and 6. To put it bluntly, he's a suicidal drug addict whose house isn't in order but wishes for people to live with individual responsibility when he can't do the same. Tradcons and cognitive dissonance... 🤦🏻‍♂️

@basedbagel Nobility is just a fancy way of society holding a man hostage to his "own" values. There's no point in upholding values that leads to our own detriment.

This is a precursor of my contempt for utilitarianism, and why society only values self sacrifice as long its not them doing so.

There is no nobility in taking uncanny levels of abuse.

It doesn't make you any less of a man to Just leave.

@sardonicsmile True. Its amusing for Pearl to be an advocate for fairer marriage laws when marriage was never fair to a man at all. Think about it - regardless of whether its in men's best interests to do so, it still serves in favour to women due to men's instinct to "protect and provide" for her. All this talk of "responsibility" is really another way of expressing men's detriment to forego their freedom for life to serve a woman. Traditional marriage is voluntary servitude repackaged.

Fe-fail: "I don't know why I can't find a good man."

MGTOW: per picrel.

Wahman: *tries to trap you with common law marriage via cohabitation*

*MGTOW has entered the chat*

@RodrickSage I don't treat morality seriously because people act in their own self interests. This applies regardless of how a person is construed as "pure", as there's a degree of selfishness to achieve, in the religious sense, eternal salvation. For instance, are kind acts really "kind", or are they are price of admission to gain entry to heavenly bliss in the afterlife? It appears to be transactional from a certain point of view.

@sardonicsmile I've occasionally heard Pearl's views, via snippets, on the contemporary state of affairs plaguing society today, and something isn't adding up. Isn't it unusual for a woman to be that "based" and use MGTOW talking points? Doesn't it demonstrate how a woman gets to say anything and not be answerable to the same consequences inflicted on freethinking men?

How can it be a consideration to welcome a chameleon into fold of MGTOW? To do otherwise is contrary to MGTOW principles...

@sardonicsmile Despite my disagreement with Walsh's views on marriage and traditionalism, I concur with his position on free speech. Isn't a ban on free speech an encroachment of an American's right to freely express themselves?

@Stahesh @basedbagel Hiring managers: we treat our staff like family.

*does casual lay offs due to budget cuts*

Me: :DisappointedPepe: *Invokes doge spirit animal picrel*

@PatriarchsHittingMarks No worries, fe-fails are cringe inducing these days. Can't catch a break from them. :DisappointedPepe:

@crimsonrealist My "to the wall" comment was for the waHmUn in the clip you shared. Understandable mix up.

@PatriarchsHittingMarks Oh right, lol. Apologies for the confusion. Just couldn't tolerate any person with Communist/Marxist connotations due to previous run-ins with them IRL. They're everywhere...

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.