houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

Perhaps I shouldn't, but I get tempted to watch the whatever podcast/clips. My morbid curiosity got the better of me when I saw this.

Sure, I am not the first to share this image. But there is something I found out listening to the episode. The one known as "al.weeezy" is troon. But everyone was saying "wow I did not see that, you totally pass!"

Well, when you have so many layers of fat that you no longer look human, does it really matter if you "pass?"

@[email protected] We can even go the route of banning knives or any other items that can be used as weapons. And still, we will have to worry about violence and death, because you are never going to have muscle or size control.

@deprecated_ii So your theory is a case of those women having misunderstanding the cause-and-effect chain? You may be on to something, as we see that with all the "body positivity" and "big is beautiful" propaganda by fat women.

It makes sense that women would come to this conclusion, because this is how they think. They are far more likely to go along with social pressures, thus they think men will if they attempt the same thing on them.

I forgot to mention crime, which no shock, these people also want to be soft on crime. No, your city planning policies will not fix crime (despite their claims) if you are not going to make sure to harshly punish these crimes.

Hey, maybe people do not want to worry that they are going to be beaten and/or mugged on public transit, so they would prefer to be safe in their own cars instead. Is that possible? Oh, you want to blame the symptoms for the problem rather than being soft on crime policy.

Not just idealism at work, but also the additional laws and policies they advocate and vote for.

High taxes? Check.
Expansive welfare state? Check.
Gun control? Check.
LGBTABCDEFG crap? Check.
Other nanny state policies? Check.

Oh look, all shit I hate that you also want to have implemented. So when you make me choose between car dependent cities and walkable cities with a whole lot of other policies I hate, I will go with the former.

I do not want to be against having less car dependency and more walkable cities. The problem is that most of the advocates for these policies have a package deal of other politics that are naive leftist crap.

"[Mostly homogenous and high country] has better city design than in the US! We should be more like them." Which ignores that we have a diverse (and therefore low trust) society in the US. We cannot pretend that city planning will solve problems that come with diversity.

@zebuceta Those women in Hong Kong probably do a lot of walking and NOT stuff their face with food at every moment, which of course is going to be healthier and help them be thinner. Also, this leads to my theory that excess makeup use over time causes a vicious cycle of damaging a woman's face which the response is to use even more makeup.

What if women just held off on using makeup for a while? Maybe see if that helps with their "bad skin" problems.

@WashedOutGundamPilot And I can speak from experience myself that the references I know with anime and video games are not how I would connect with my wife, because she does not have interest in those things. Big deal. We can talk about other things.

@WashedOutGundamPilot First, the idea that a man "needs help" for wanting a woman in her prime is insane as it is an attempt to subvert nature itself (never a smart idea, as instincts are there for a reason).

Second, being able to "banter" or just spout familiar references are so unimportant to a relationship that it is ridiculous to even elevate it's importance. It is more of a red herring than anything.

@professionalbigot69 >zero quality of life

Tell you what, I will take my "zero quality of life" for much cheaper while this faggot pays out the ass for whatever stupid or vapid bullshit he thinks makes his quality of life great.

This is the male equivalent of the iPhone women who think that having green bubbles on her phone is a turn-off. Enjoy the lack of testosterone in your dating pool, iPhone idiots.

@deprecated_ii >to simulate a real world scenario

Yes, the enemy is going to be exactly where you want them to be so that they can just be killed by you.

I would rather not have WWIII, but it might be darkly amusing to see everyone who thinks we can take China in a fight see just how poorly things would go. And even then they just believe we are winning because the media says so. Because we are seeing that already with Ukraine.

@kaiservenom The phrase is false in the sense that it is meant to imply that the man is only able to be successful due to the woman being there, as if he owes his success to her somehow supporting him or whatever. But it is true that there are women behind successful men because women wait at the finish line and only stick around with successful men.

@kaiservenom I have heard koalas are quite vicious creatures, so it would be a really bad idea to try to make one of them a pet.

@PapaPole @redmaple Found something through the /pol/ rabbit hole.

https://yashar.substack.com/p/exclusive-video-reveals-steven-crowder

I do not want to jump to too many conclusions, but this does signal that the marriage had some issues and that they were not on stable ground as a married couple. I don't think it puts Steven in a good light.

@PapaPole If it is true that he is unpleasant to live with, that should have been apparent before. Which is why I think that the children coming into play is the biggest factor. I don't know everything about Steven Crowder, nor if much of the rumors are true. But there was likely something that made Hilary think that he was not fit as a father.

Just a theory though.

And if it was not about the children, I would think she would have pulled the pin before they had children, because it is a really, really bad idea to have a divorce when you have the kids so young. Not unless there are extreme circumstances.

Though that would be assuming she thought things through. And often, women do not.

Not saying there is anything more to the story, but their kids were hardly that old when the divorce started. Statistically, I have seen that it takes 4 years after the youngest kid is born before this sort of thing happens. Thus I have suspiciouns.

I have to wonder if Hilary thought poorly of Steven as a father. Though that is also the sort of thing you should know after being married for years and all.

Having a bit of a think here with the whole Steven Crowder getting divorced. He and his wife were married for a number of years, and the moment they have kids, she divorces him.

One theory is that having children revealed cracks that already existed in the marriage, as having children makes everything more difficult. But it still seems strange that she would not have divorced him sooner.

Side note, having children involved makes divorce far, far worse.