Show newer

@ButtWorldsMan I see this as a possible ploy to try and dampen Trump's popularity, as I suspect they expect these rulings to be overturned. Meanwhile, they can use the "If a judge and several lawsuits said he was dangerous, it means he is!"

I don't know if that is the plan or if it is a good one, but this does not demonstrate that they see themselves able to stand on their own competence.

Colorado was just meant to start the trend. The regime is very shook.

For context, understand that polls show Trump doing well even in swing states. Concern over the economy & the reality of real world price inflation (not the faggot government statistic) that people actually see in their costs is at the top of people's minds during this election. Dems know if economic circumstances are bad, people vote against the incumbent. The desperation is real. They're just blatantly rigging the election

Something that was pointed out recently was that the idea that Third Worlders want to come to White countries because they're nicer to live in fail to fully acknowledge that the reason they are like that is because the environment was deliberately made nicer to live in. Diseases were eradicated through public policies and as a result endemic pathogens like Yellow Fever and Malaria were​ removed from the environment. Virginia went from a place where 20% of the population died in the summer during colonization from malaria to just a nice place to live because of pesticides and draining wetlands. With uncontrolled immigration reintroducing diseases wiped out decades, sometimes centuries prior, things can revert back really quickly.
When people are like "Oh, we're making sure we make banned books available to little kids!", I always think "Banned books like Mein Kampf?"

@Aether And while he may not be someone who should have marriage, I cannot blame him for looking at things as he does with our current system. Get government out of marriage entirely (or at least the bullshit divorce laws) and you can have marriage working as intended.

Ideally, you would trust the woman you want to marry. But there is no reason to give her a "get out of marriage with cash and prizes button" in the first place.

@Aether >has 100k in student loans

She is already a bad prospect because of this. A woman who takes on a ton of debt and is unable to pay it off is simply a liability in not just her debt, but her financial choices. That kind of debt is no accident. She either went to a way too expensive school and/or took out the max loans while refusing to work while doing college. And probably for some meme degree too.

The "debt-free" part of the "debt-free virgins without tattoos," very important.

@Shadowman311 This is why there was so much emphasis on women marrying early so that they would not become "Old Maids." When you ask normies today if Old Maids still are still in our society today, they will probably answer, "Of course not!" But still we see the same thing with women not marrying when they have the best chance of securing a husband, only to find out later that they did not have "all the time in the world."

@Gerfand I don't need to be a Michelin Star Chef to know if my steak is burnt to a char and if my "baked potato" is still hard as an apple. I can tell that the food was not well prepared and is not how it was meant to be.

And I can tell when some faggot is taking way too many creative liberties with translations to know if they are not doing their job properly.

I just think the issues are far more complex than the simpleton math that OP attempts to sell. The issue lies at the intersection of many legal theories and rules, culture, and the natural flow of economic markets and systems.

One thing I note here is something I saw with a lot of my classmates as we approached graduation, and that's that many believed that they had to work for someone, for a firm. It didn't even occur to them that they could work for themselves. Mental slaves.

I of course sat down and did some very simple math — "I'm poor as fuck. If I get my license, I can make charge $xxx.xx an hour starting. If I work four hours a month (and collect on it), I can pay rent on a small apartment. If I work another four, I can buy groceries. And so on. I just need to put up an advert and get a one or two clients a month to start."

I didn't have any "profit" my first five years, and there were period were I had employees, and there were times when I loaned money in to make payroll until I collect that "big check" from client X. Cash flow isn't always fluid. I didn't see the employees chipping in their dime or taking a pay cut to help out. Everyone's a communist until they have to pay to keep the business running.

@Humpleupagus @moffintosh @Xenophon @MasterSimper >Everyone's a communist until they have to pay to keep the business running.

Far too many communists just assume businesses are automatically profitable and constantly flush with excess money like Scrooge McDuck. But that is to be expected when most communists are just envious rather than truly principled.

@Jim Christmas is not about snow. It is about the birth of Jesus. Don't let the song White Christmas fool you into thinking otherwise.

Let's check in on El Salvador.

Hmmm, I don't see any dancing degenerates. He's not promoting marxism or globohomo faggotry. He seems to be in favor of his own nation, which we know is heresy, and he's not telling people to kill themselves to cut down on climate pollution. Uhmazin.

I rate it far-right fascist nazi/10. Not enough Democracy™.

Pay inside or pre pay only at your gas station. This is a great signal for the amount of trust/criminality in a given area.

Recently, a gas station I regularly use that had a pay inside option no longer does that. It makes me wonder if there were too many incidents of theft or if they just want to be proactive. Either way, there is less trust.

Trust itself is an invaluable thing to have. Not having it is a sign of bad times ahead. And no amount of money makes up for a lost in trust.

Businesses and people were not going through all sorts of stupid bullshit because of "the virus." Not when some of the most laughable policies were put in place, such as having tents out in the middle of winter at restaurants so that they could do "outdoor seating" to comply with completely unnecessary rules. Let us not forget how many businesses were fined or facing other penalties because they dared not accept the hysteria that every libshit had during "the pandemic."

Show thread

I am so sick of still hearing how "Covid shut everything down" in 2020. No, it was not "the virus" that did it. It was governments doing it. And considering how much they lied about the supposed death numbers (dying "with Covid" is considered a "Covid death" even if the death was obviously not due to that) and many other things, it is quite clear that so many supposed issues were indeed avoidable. They merely wanted you to not rightfully blame them for screwing everyone over.

@Twoinchdestroya @Jim @RealRaul They were in an "open marriage" so you can assume that the number is as high as she wanted it to be. Which is probably very, very high.

@Zeb This is just about Christian denominations. Muslims are a whole different topic, though I would guess they are growing in numbers in the UK. And my guess is that they are less accepting of any changes in their teachings and practices than most other Christian denominations.

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.