houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

Overt actions would be the government stepping in directly. But covertly, we see many frivolous lawsuits to go through the courts while the government either sits by or is actively encouraging the people initiating the lawsuits to force companies to waste money on lawyers for cases that never should have gone to court.

My guess is salaries for do-nothing positions are cheaper than lawyers for many employers.

Just think about how much more productive and efficient our economy would be if companies did not have to hire so many dead weight employees that are only there to avoid a lawsuit. A lot of money is wasted because our government will overtly or covertly make life a living hell for companies who do not bend the knee to DIE policies.

I really doubt employers want to throw money down the drain for positions that lead to not only no additional productivity, but often less productivity.

One addendum to make, the "love you" part is not a "will never." She will love you and see you as a proper man. I need to work on my wording sometimes.

@Indignation @shortstories I am pretty sure I have seen it, but I can watch it again. I am well aware of this fact. That is a major reason why women in general dislike math and science.

@shortstories That could be part of it. I do theorize that many women are operating as they are due to society coddling them, and that they would change their behavior with proper consequences.

Though as for math, many women often just hate it. Think how often you have heard "I hate math." Is it usually a man, or a woman saying this?

Hell, let's make a poll. Men, if you had a woman who earned enough to provide for a family with her work, would you be willing to be a "house husband?"

Added conditions, she will never cheat, divorce you, love you, and still see you as a proper man (fantasy land, I know, but this is all hypothetical).

Another side topic, the amazing cope of "men can just adjust to not being the primary breadwinners by finding other roles such as working part time or being the husband that stays at home."

Great! Let's see how well that works when we try to sell that to women, who still want men to fulfill that provider role/earning more. It is like retards pushing these ideas never see what the landscape looks like. It turns out, the natural order of men earning more is preferred by both men and women.

This thought came to mind when I was watching this video which has quite the bluepilled take about men becoming more right wing. Here, we can see the full display of the pro equality mindset that feminism is good and that those who oppose feminism only do so because they were "unfairly ahead."

What if men are just better at certain things than women? Such as math, science, athletics, and a variety of other things?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54H8ppxnp8I

There is a fundamental issue with the quote "Equality always feels like a loss to people who are previously unfairly ahead" when you assume that those who are opposed to "equality" are doing so because they fit this category.

Sometimes, they are upset because they are being forcefully dragged back when they were getting ahead by their own merits. Many pro-equality/equity people operate under the assumption that inequality is the result of someone rigging things. Some people are just inferior.

@Indignation Quick question I would have for her, what field of study are these degrees in? Most likely, it is some bullshit like "Communications." She is hardly "overqualified" for the job offer she got, she is merely overeducated. Though "education" these days just means going through a degree mill rather than actually learning something.

Her parents failed her in telling her "any degree is a good degree," as well as her desire for "the college experience."

@Terry Lot of things going wrong here. First, the "Catholics for Choice" is already wrong in by even trying to exist, as Catholics should NEVER be "pro-choice." Second, Jesus being crucified was not about resisting colonialism. In fact the Jewish chief priests were mad that he was calling them out for their hypocrisy rather than leading a rebellion against the Romans. And we need not worry about "not all Jews" at the time accusing Jesus, just watch how they react when you talk about him today.

@IAMAL_PHARIUS Men are not asking women to cake on all that crap. They insist on doing that themselves. Just a minimal amount of makeup is fine if you are taking care of what is important, such as not being fat and not getting acne from eating greasy food all the time.

This woman is just demanding you accept her upcharge for no benefit for you.

I am posting this again. Because I love traditions. Even if they are the ones I made up myself.

@shortstories I can see this being a "promising" possibility, only for it to absolutely fail due to factors that the people pushing for this in the name of tranny idealogy willfully ignore.

My guess is that transplanting a uterus in a body that was never meant to hold one will make it non-functional. Though I could be wrong. But I am not betting for it to actually work.

@ButtWorldsMan It is hard for me to know whether or not these people are unaware of their cognative dissonance with them changing what they want on a whim or if they are unashamedly aware that they are just advocating for whatever is convenient for them in the moment.

Those that are are unaware need the hard lessons of consequences, and those that are aware deserve no sympathy when they get what they asked for.

@kamehamic @Aether @Crux_Invictus Either this story is fake and gay or these are terrible examples of Christians and they should all be ashamed for partaking in such actions and still calling themselves "Christian."