Show newer

Here's a tip for making your experience flying in an airplane more comfortable: just wear sweatpants for the trip.

This was something I never thought up myself, but I saw a co-worker on a business trip doing this, and I realized the genius of it. Who are you trying to impress when you are flying? The pilot? The stewardesses? Your fellow passengers? That attractive woman you saw during a layover who was going to a different destination?

Wearing something comfortable just makes things easier.

There would be a lot less stress and anxiety in society overall if we stopped fighting against what nature intended. I specifically am referring to women and their general desire to have children who instead choose the career path and/or grad school path because they were told they needed to go out there and be accomplished.

Many of them do not even want to any of this and would rather be stay-at-home mothers. But apparently social stigma is stronger than biological urges. But only to a point.

The only thing going for the West right now is innertia from decades of Meritocracy while their foes were communists. That's all that left. The second the US as it's core with the resources and military might to ship them hits a wall it all falls apart. The industrial capacity is gone, the resources are not invested in, and the global commodities provider base is going to shift and create better economic fundamentals for whoever takes the mantle AND especially if TWRA happens.

Show thread

Therefore, the male equivalent of a slut is not merely a man that is too willing to give out his commitment to women in terms of being willing to enter a relationship, but being too easy to give away his resources to women. The man that gives money to OnlyFans models is far more fitting for that equivalency. Like a slut giving out sex too easily, the man who gives up his finances to women too easily is the true equivalent to a slut.

Show thread

Something occurred to me when the discussion of gatekeepers of sex came up on the "whatever" stream (not worth watching full through). The women were talking about "male sluts," showing that they do not understand the roles men and women play as gatekeepers. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, and men are the gatekeepers of commitment. But what is "commitment" in this context really? It is not really about being devoted to one in a relationship, but more about committing one's resources.

@lina @Repoast Perhaps you should look at the silliness that is “Planet Fitness”

They literally have pizza night, where members get to eat their fill of goyslop

they have the “lunk alarm” which is supposed to be hit to sound a blaring noise whenever you see someone “showing off”, lifting heavy weights, and grunting

It’s tailor-made to accommodate obese, insecure women and make them feel like they can workout, too. You could probably write a whole thesis about what you learn from modern america from Planet Fitness commercials alone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdNz38i4qnU&list=RDQMvSaxrbvcpwQ&start_radio=1

When you see the idea that a lot of current-day society regarding men is basically a ham-fisted attempt to keep the lid on a boiling pot it makes sense.

-Normalize masturbation

Normalize weed consumption as a daily ritual
Destroy healthy eating patterns
Demonize functional health (peacocking fitness marginally accepted)
Enact systems that separate men from their families in order to pursue gainful employment
Normalize moving jobs in order to advance (prevents team/community building that threatens your power)
Normalize pointless sex with strangers
Normalize absentee fathers as the standard (their sons will be raised in the cult by the state and gullible conformist moms)
Convince the world that men only show interest in mentorship and teaching children when they want to rape them (no more replacement father figures for the bastard sons)
Surround boys from birth with a cult of feminine operation. Ensure they’re programmed with female social code and mores so that they behave like women in their group dynamics and socialization (keeps them seeking approval from the consensus)

(did this post without @ him so his mentions don’t get hammered in case this becomes its own thread)

I have a feeling this guy would not be a fan of NotJustBikes.

If people could be responsible for themselves, no government would be necessary.

If people require government to be responsible for them, they will be ruled by those made responsible.

You cannot elect a government to be responsible for the people, while the people retain their authority. That is why democracy is a joke, and why it can only be maintained via deceit and illusion.

Responsibility and authority go together. To sever the two is to invite destruction and tyranny in equal measure.

Recently found out about a channel called "whatever" on youtube. Similar to the style of Fresh and Fit. I can save everyone a lot of time summarizing how the conversations usually go.

Brian: In general, women want a guy who is more dominant.

One or more of the women guests: No, no, I and one other friend I have totally like guys who are more the submissive type.

Even if such statements are truthful (doubt is heavy here), the guest always treat exceptions like they are equal to the norms.

@furgar

Should have spent more.

His "vacation" means "time when he does not have to account for who he meets."

Also, since it was set loose earlier than planned, it makes sense that it was not quite as deadly as they were wanting it to be.

Along with that, the vaxx causing heart issues might be fully intended too, as it would allow them to kill the elderly once more without raising suspicion. Pushing it for everyone was indeed retarded, but I do see the booster campaigns targeting the elderly the most, which supports that theory too.

Show thread

I just thought of something. We know for a fact that Covid was a result of gain of function research, and that even in the early days, the mortality rate of infants and toddlers was almost 0, which is quite different than what we see with the flu, where they are more vulnerable.

This makes me wonder if the primary purpose was to cull the elderly in the first place. Given the problems with funding Social Security and Medicare, it certainly would cut down a lot of those costs.

public intellectuals really start to believe their own press after they stop trying to do anything difficult and spend a few years doing nothing but explaining freshman-level concepts to internet people

they get so used to being the expert, the smartest person in the self-selected room, that they think it extends to everything in the world

whereas people who do difficult things are regularly humbled by failures, even if only minor ones

And the US likely would intervene because of the people running the show through their puppet Biden would no way let their sacred "democracy" get stopped because the people in the country decide to see how the numbers really pan out in a full scale conflict.

Let nations decide their own fate? NO! The "democracy enthusiasts" cannot let other countries settle things out on their own! They have to interfere so that globohomo can march on!

Show thread

Looking back at the whole Brazil election (with likely "fortifications" by the CIA), I have to wonder if Bolsonaro did choose to cross the Rubicon if that could have sparked WWIII. I really doubt that countries like the US would not double down on making sure that the "correct" result was kept in place by sending their own military. And after that, all bets would be off with who else might decide to enter the fray. Which could mean WWIII.

Maybe all this would not happen, but I have to wonder.

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.