Show newer

Having not been in school for long enough, I am not sure if the DARE program is still going on or how long it has not been in place. Regardless, the DARE program is the perfect example of how "education" does not solve major problems. It is not that people lack information about drugs being bad, we already know that. The people that use drugs got all that info, they just don't care.

This same principle can be applied in many other areas. So don't let libshits tell you education is the solution.

I would say "hero," but he was not simply doing this out of the goodness of his heart, but for profit. Still, might have saved some people from "dying suddenly" or "long covid."

theepochtimes.com/pharmacist-c

The largest lithium mine in North America has been cleared to start operations in Nevada.

npr.org/2023/07/17/1188204958/tribes-object-federal-ruling-approves-lithium-mine

This is NPR so naturally they think this is a bad thing for their readers/listeners to get angry about while they drive around in their electric cars.

The military is not only full of vaxed, trannies, women, faggots and dykes, but also fucking retards. @Tfmonkey

Horrifying possibility: Multiple timelines are not a work of fiction, but reality. And our timeline is the best one there is.

Anyone can say they do not like the current US healthcare system and say it should be improved. But when discussing solutions, if you have one person saying we should go full free market and the other saying we should have it fully socialized, then you are not going to find any agreement beyond "the current system sucks."

And besides, we see currently that both proponents think the presence of elements of each other's system is the problem while their own is the solution.

Show thread

If someone I am conversing with says they also do not like what is going on with token gay characters in movies, it might seem like we agree when I say I do not like it either. But when I find out the reason they do not like it is because they think there is not enough emphasis on the homosexual character and that they should have more than a few seconds of onscreen homosexuality, then it is most certainly not the same thing as me not wanting it to be present at all.

Show thread

I always cringe at the mention of "we want the same things"/"we agree on more than we disagree" when it is someone who has politics that are diametrically opposed to my own. When you want to go the exact opposite direction that I do, we are nowhere near "wanting the same things."

Having some vague "same" end goal is not the same thing as a fully implemented set of policies seen to their conclusion. Because of this, common ground is most often not found.

We will most likely see a much different world in the coming years with the decline of the United States. Many people are not ready for that.

We are not so special that we will be immune to the pattern of history where a once powerful empire falls. We too will follow suit.

Show thread

So many people are not ready for the "bad guys" to win. They do not realize that it is a very real possibility. Nor can they contemplate that Russia is not being uniquely evil for "invading a sovereign country." Territorial shifting is something that has happened many, many times. It is just not something that they ever thought would happen now. Not with the post WWII and post Cold War world.

Show thread

And this is where the prolonged period of relative peace has heavily skewed the perspective of those in the west. War is just something you see on a screen; either on the news or in a movie. And every time they see it, the US wins, because we are the best! And we are fighting for what is right (except when the media tells you otherwise).

But what if we are not as strong as we thought. Then what?

Show thread

This is regardless of who is right or wrong in this conflict. Russia (or at least Putin) sees taking regions like the Donbass as a part of its interests. Most likely, Russia will keep this territory.

However, the counter offensive narrative wants to suggest otherwise. Because the "good guys" are supposed to win, just like all the WWII movies and history lessons have told us. But what happens when we lose? This does not even cross the mind of those with a Ukraine flag in their profile.

Show thread

These same people also do not understand the history of borders. Countries all got their territory from conquest and violence. Where many of the current borders exist are a result of some violence at some point, even if it is not in living memory.

So when Russia has been claiming more territory for themselves, this may be shocking to those who never thought about the history of every other border in the world. Borders also change, and often as a result of violence/war.

Show thread

The normie masses cannot properly assess world events such as Russia invading Ukraine. Their perspective has been heavily warped by modern sensibilities and separation from any genuine conflict or strife that they do not understand what war means or why it happens.

Thinking in terms of "bad guys" and "good guys" in this war means you do not understand the nature of conflict. Everyone is acting in what they perceive to be their self interest. Nothing more.

@Eiregoat @Griffith @DEERBLOOD @dickflatteningenthusiast what they'll do take is take their "Russia has already lost" publications and just make them more emphatic. Putin wanted to take over the whole world but NATO stopped him at Conquer Target #1! Putin wanted to replace the US as the world's single superpower but now he's having to settle for this 'multipolar world' cope! Putin was going to genocide all Ukrainians but wow 70% of Ukrainians still remain alive! Putin wanted to remove Ukraine from the map but look this tiny rump state is still called Ukraine! Putin wanted to destroy NATO but now he's having to settle with Ukraine not joining NATO!

What a loser.
@PixelBillion @flawless And they do to them what they tried to do to gaming adaptations. They can't just present the story and characters as are, they feel the need to change things so "the audience can relate". Fuck relating. The properties gained popularity by being written the way they were. Good stories, interesting hooks, novel concepts don't need some hipsters intervention and reveisionism. But they can't help themselves. They always do it. Look at shit like the Dragon Ball movie and how absolutely awful that was.

“credible experts” are lying, because they wouldn’t be allowed to interact with NAFO in any way, shape, or form unless it was controlled. Groups and memes evolve quickly, there’s no way they would allow governmental profiles to interact openly with it, much less stamp it w/ approval and enthusiasm, if they didn’t have confidence they can steer the “movement” where they want it.

Remember how badly they whined about trump using pepe? Pepe was just a frog in the beginning, a blank canvas for 10,000 memes, but it later became the ULTRA FAR RIGHT NAZI DOG WHISTLE the lefties hated and feared. Given the wignat presence in ukraine, any real, organic meme would have a fair chance of taking a turn for the inappropriate. They wouldn’t want their name attached to something that lends normies to say “hey, didn’t adam kinzinger post a bunch of those ‘Azov Nigger-Slaying Kike-Crucifying Doge memes? That was messed up“

Show thread
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.