Show newer

@Based_Accelerationist @Tfmonkey

Get Keith Woods on, or even Ryan Dawson. Keith has the philosophy down and both have the balls to offer solutions.

Jay Dyer has the intellectual chops to do it, but he won't touch the JQ seriously or offer solutions.

Fuentes could also do a decent job of it.

I'm just glad more of these conversations are happening.

@Based_Accelerationist @Tfmonkey

That was OK.

It's a white pill that Alex Jones can have this conversation, but infortunately Stew Peters isn't at Alex's level.

He asks Stew (~ 20:45) how is it possible to reconcile left-wing academic Jews with neocon Zionists, and Stew can't answer it. Alex even gives him a hint by mentioning Hegelian dialectics and still Stew can't answer.

I want Alex to have this conversation, but with someone who can match him, like Keith Woods.

@UncleIroh @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

"Chrisitian deontological ethics"

NGL had to google that but I agree with you.

But in this specific case if I find proof a baby is dead by someone's hands they better have a DAMN good explanation or

@FinalDresdonation

Holy shit. This is literally the basis for all zombie sci-fi. I Am Legend here we come.

Seems the Japs are now allowing openly naked full genetic modification. This 'SA' style model will give full repeoductive coding to cells. So the immediate side effects are lesser, but the cells themselves spread reproductive code to rewrite more cells so that they produce spike proteins more quickly from the entire immune system.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=mu1xVO8Y

@UncleIroh @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

"you have no moral basis to refute "love is love" pedohilia"

This is why I can't get behing subjective morality.

But for some reason only religious people see my view on this. I wonder why that is?

I don't have any peer-reviewed studies to debunk pedophilia but i do have a hockey masks and a special set of skills.

@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

> Impact > intent.

So Consequentialism then, an outcomes-based morality.

For me, that's a non-starter. Chrisitian deontological ethics is better.

@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

At that point, literal child sacrifice is just a sneeze away.

@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

The larger point is that if you use secularism and paganism to justify murdering babies, then you have no moral basis to refute "love is love" pedohilia, and you are incentivized to turn such acts into a pagan spiritual rite in order to justify it.

This is where we are.

@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

All true. The sunk cost of having gone so far prevents most women and mothers from admitting this.

@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

We're not collectively ready to acknowlege it or have the conversation at all.

For one, a true redpilling would destroy too many women. They wouldn't be able to handle the accountability for what they've done.

@UncleIroh @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

You're right but its a heavy subject matter even for me.

I'd love to adress the trampant witchraft but again in a Godless country such as this they're not satanic, you're just not tolerant enough and still believe in fairy tales

@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

I hear you. I was also fooled into believing it was OK.

@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

People think child sacrifice isn't a thing anymore or that it couldn't come back. They're dead wrong.

@basedbagel @shortstories @Mongoliaboo

Goodbye elites.

Related to this, we're long overdue an honest conversation about child sacrifice, mostly it's pre-Christian prevalence, but also the current neo-pagan revival going on.

Pedophilia, child sacrifice and abortion are all linked and it's not just Jews.

Example, the hashtag on TikTok has 49 billion views. That's billion. Videos teaching girls/women how to do "abortion magic" where they ritualize it for material gain.

Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.