@sunmcnukes @Frondeur @Ghislaine
"it was Portuguese navigator Ferdinand Magellan who "discovered" the Philippine"
So if they were Spanish ruled and descendants of Spanish people instead of Portugese people
Then they are Latinos of Spanish ancestry instead of Latinos of Portugese ancestry
Or alternatively they could be Latinos of Spanish and Portugese ancestry
How Male Minimalism Threatens the US Economy https://youtube.com/watch?v=I7n5WZOx_j4&si=RIWiiyxtWgMsTQgh
this week has been bad, at horribly sick, had to clock one day at work anyway, and in that same day, when i get back home, i find my mom on the kitchen floor.
so that a trip to the hospital, while my work threating me if i was going to miss more days. one thing is me; another thing is my mom in the hospital, they can suspend me if they want.
sure, after the pandemics employers care less if you're sick,
harder to see a doctor you first need to get blood work done to see if its covid nor not.
@unabomber The gospels are indeed retrofited versions of Jesus history to appeal to either romans or jews and convert them to christianity. But Jesus history wasn't a fabrication in itself, otherwise, the retrofited parts wouldn't have such plotholes. (6/6)
@unabomber Bethelem a clear fabrication trying to retrofit on the idea of Jesus of Nazareth, also, if the romans were the one who fabricated this, shouldn't they at least knew their own history from some decades ago?
Also, the jews believed the messiah would come from their tribe (tribe of Judah), instead Jesus closest blood related tribe is the tribe of Levi (the tribe where the high priests come from). A fabrication aimed at jews shouldn't have this problem, either. (5/?)
@unabomber then Jesus wouldn't have been from Nazareth, instead all four gospels classify him as "Jesus of Nazareth", Matthew and Luke do try to argue that 'Akctually' Jesus was born in Bethelem because his family had to go back since the census required Joseph to come back to the land of his lineage, Judah, but the problem is that the historic figures and events doesn't fit the historical records of the romans to support this tale, making the idea that Jesus was born in (4/?)