shortstories @[email protected]

@shortstories @LudditeMan I hope you're mistaken because if a nigger didn't even die and all those people died and all those businesses were ruined for nothing.... oh wait that's almost hilarious again...

@AlphaKiloPapa

Kikes ordered the September Eleven terrorist attack

@shortstories @nomebullyyou I don't even think "George Floyd" was an actual person. He even came with a "rent-a-fambly." Everything about the incident screamed "fake."

@Tfmonkey article for Wednesday or something to talk about on Saturday:

France tries to cut spending, hundreds of thousands of people protest. Some trains stop running and even students leave schools. Unions mostly behind it.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/french-unions-strike-against-austerity-pressuring-macron-2025-09-18/

Kikes did September 11 terrorist attack

Women the Herald of Chaos
https://youtu.be/NOucWrWSZFo?si=megbDpqrNoN2IsFI

https://www.mgtow.tv/v/f9ITHu

https://rumble.com/v6z4h84-women-the-harold-of-chaos.html

"Cui Bono?"

I was catching up on the Sat & Wed show last night over my shift, and I have some thoughts to share about Charlie Kirk, in no particular order:

•We are not analyzing a sane world with sane actors. We are in the world of the Uvalde shooting (with cops ordered to do nothing), the Las Vegas shooting, the clot shot, and general female empowerment. Sanity should not be presumed.

•"What would Israel be trying to cover up by assassinating him?" Not every assassination is part of a ➡️

➡️ coverup. Sometimes, an assassination is meant to send a message.
If Israel is a regime that is currently commiting a well-known genocide, and has the American ruling class so firmly by the balls, that they had nothing to fear from Charlie Kirk... then a more fitting question might be "Why wouldn't they just shoot him?" An assassination could very easily be meant to cow the US public - particularly the youth.

•"There are certain markers, that indicate something like deep state involvement." ➡️

➡️ Under normal circumstances, that statement sounds reasonable enough. But we are not in normal circumstances. The US is teetering, and according to many, Israel is on the brink of betraying the US to BRICS.

•"Cui Bono? How would such an act benefit Israel?" I don't think TFM's scope is wide enough on this question. If Israel is about to betray the West to BRICS in order to preserve themselves... 🤔 What do they have to offer BRICS, in order to make that deal? What would BRICS want from Israel?➡️

➡️ Without any firm assertion, it seems at least plausible that assassinating Charlie Kirk could fit into the framework of such a deal. Presumably, BRICS would like to accelerate the collapse of the West while avoiding WWIII. A bugaloo could accomplish that. I mean sure, Israel is so embedded in the regime that they know where the bodies are buried... and so what? Material aid (such as fomenting civil war), is so much more useful to BRICS than such knowledge.

•"Why would Israel do that, when ➡️

➡️ there's opposition to Netenyahu within Israel itself?" Well... Much like economics, politics also works at any scale - meaning that there's a regime of the Zionist faction of the regime, within Israel itself. And at the top of that pile? (as far as anyone can tell) - Bibi. If Mossad were to be involved... who would give the order? Would Israel take a vote on it? ...no. Bibi would call the shot. And he's currently waging a genocide in the West Bank.

•"Why would Israel fear Charlie Kirk?" ➡️

➡️ Israel would fear Charlie Kirk, for the same reason that Israel would fear TikTok. Yes, Tucker Carlson is bigger. And yes, there are many dipshits on the Internet criticizing Israel. But for all we know, Tucker is controlled. I understand Tucker has a family history of deep state activity. For all we know, grifter status notwithstanding, Charlie Kirk was the biggest uncontrolled opposition to Israel. That opposition was still embryonic, and rather tepid. But only Israel would truly know if ➡️

➡️ Charlie Kirk was controlled or not. And as a side note... whether Charlie Kirk was a grifter or not, would be utterly irrelevant to Israel. Israel is a nation of grifters (with *possible* exception of the Orthodox). Israel would not dismiss Charlie Kirk, or any threat he posed, simply for him being a grifter.

•Why does the analysis assign so much reasoned calculation, to the same country that has *twice* targeted diplomats under the guise of "peace talks"? Why wouldn't Israel be reckless? ➡️

➡️
•I have no trouble accepting that Israel views America, in the same way that America views Ukraine. Given that, if some young Ukrainian rabble-rouser started rousing rabble in a manner that could even remotely interfere with America's meddling in that foreign land that no one here gives a shit about... what would America do about that without hesitation? 🤔🤔🤔

https://open.substack.com/pub/thewesternspirit/p/the-books-they-dont-want-you-to-read?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1hyip9