@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey I am not a fan of this flow chart because it makes too many assumptions. For example, what if you want people to leave you alone, but don't mind working with others for mutual benefit? That doesn't fit into this chart. We also need to define what absolute truth is before entering the flow chart, but "How do we access these truths?" might redefine what "truth" is.
@DoubleD @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey
Then you end up like Randy weaver inna woods. He worked with other and wanted to be left alone too.
And the chart answers your questions
>you’re a relativist with low Iq. Consider euthanasia
Why if you lock two Jews in a room, they’ll invent 5 orgs, NGO’s, committees in two hours
@Deuces @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey If the chart answered my questions, I'd not have asked them here, I'd have read the chart.
@DoubleD @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey
First box on the right is for you. It Answered your question since ur using femoid cunt hair splitting. Lol. It’s like watching those cunts on Whatever show: theirs is either truth such as men are stronger than wamynz. Then cunts start whataboutism and define strong and, I know some stronk wamynz.
Plus for a bonus I illustrated what being left alone looks like. Getting shot in the face by Zogbots like Randy weaver
@Deuces @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey Ah, I see. You aren't interested in actually furthering the conversation by engaging with my question in good faith. I have nothing more beyond this message to say to you.
@DoubleD @Deuces @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey
You're right to question how "truth" is presented here.
Truth is a metaphysical claim, yet this chart makes a category error by claiming it can be accessed via empiricism.
It took me about 2 seconds to work out that the person who created this chart is an absolute fucking moron.
@UncleIroh @DoubleD @Deuces @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey
"Believing that others will react as we would is the single most dangerous myth of intervention."
- Gavin de Becker
@VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey
What happens after the do you believe in hierarchy box?
I would suggest that morality is both absolute and relative
It is relative based on your goals
But absolute once you set your goals
The universe functions in a certain physical manner
This leads to certain physical consequences for actions
This leads to an objective morality if you want consequences to be a certain way
Since if you do not live in a community where other people practice NAP you are pretty much dead or a slave
If you do not want to be enslaved you essentially have to choose to be in a community that believes something similar to the non agrression principle ( NAP ) while also choosing to live by the non agrression principle because the community will punish you for violation of it ending your freedom
But no such community exists so that leads to problems with this idea
@shortstories @VooDooMedic @Tfmonkey
Hierarchy;
>no: you believe in equality, ur a cuck or a Xtian, a simp who thinks wamynz should vote and hold political office, invade male spaces if “she’s qualified” or can be Rangers if they do few push ups; consider euthanasia
>yes: men are different. And caste systems exist for a reason.
@VooDooMedic
>magical rabbi revealed it
Kek
Where’s the bottom part Yes/No hierarchy
@VooDooMedic Fascists' needs to learn that when they have no power isn't the time to purity test your allies.