houseoftolstoy @[email protected]

@WashedOutGundamPilot For a man, it is much more difficult to be in a position where you can choose to be married. You have to fight a lot harder to make yourself worth something and be a marriageable man. This is for both good reasons (you should be a hard worker that can provide for a family to be husband-material) and bad reasons (many women are picky in the most idiotic and frivolous ways).

@WashedOutGundamPilot If you are a woman reaching the age of 25 and are saving yourself for marriage and are still unmarried, you need to ask yourself if you are truly doing everything you can to find a husband. Because when you have the greatest power of choice as a young woman, you still being single indicates that you have not placed enough priority in finding a husband.

Men are a different story.

@Indignation NOW they care about Dads when a certain group is affected. Funny how that works.

@deprecated_ii Women are more likely to be memed into getting a college degree (with lots of debt), getting a make-work job, and living in an expensive city. It is no wonder they do not have "money to do anything" if a large portion of their paycheck is going towards student loans and an overpriced apartment.

And I would love to see their actual spending habits when they say they "can't afford anything." Most likely, they are spending way to much on things that are most certainly not needed.

@hachi @PNS @Wyliesau The only "genocide" happening when it comes to those who are mentally ill enough to think they were "born in the wrong" body are what they do to themselves when they sterilize themselves. Those who are "trans" are not having any children, and in fact enabling mental illnesses is what makes their genetic line end.

And I don't care about whatever fringe cases of those who are somehow still able to have children. They should not be anyways if they are mentally ill.

@Hoss @dcc @Elf @RustyCrab @gnarley_boot @Nudhul To clarify further, they are not necessarily inconsistent, but rather they are placing certain principles higher than others. Leftists "protesting" (basically just doing anything they want regardless of how they harm others because they are doing it for "the correct reasons") is considered more important than their hatred of borders. So they push the lesser ideal aside to support the more important one.

@Hoss @dcc @Elf @RustyCrab @gnarley_boot @Nudhul Most cases of inconsistencies with leftist outrage can be attributed to them simply looking for any factor they can use as a weapon against their enemies. They do not care that usually are all against restricting borders normally. They just hope that they can use "crossing state lines" as something that will get Kyle convicted for his "crime" of defending himself against rabid leftists who totally were not there for dubious reasons themselves.

@calicocrack On the surface it does not look like that crazy of a theory. They know most people will do nothing, so they are less concerned about being careful. They do have to do damage control, so it is not as if all of it is desired. They just do not care enough to have a more competent puppet at this time.

@calicocrack I am willing to hear this 3rd reason. Maybe it will seem crazy, but I have seen plenty of theories that seem crazy out there.

@marlin @caekislove @LovecraftEnthusiast There have always been children of criminals around. I have seen very few cases where a criminal was granted an exception to being imprisoned because of his children.

What we have here is a manipulation tactic by our leftist progressive media who hates the fact that locking up criminal scum actually solves the crime problems. They just hope that you will forget every other case where children are affected by arrests of their parents.

I have to wonder if those actually in charge of the Biden admin are doing a sloppy job of covering up his obvious mental decline or if they are deliberately setting him up so that they can eject him so that they can get a puppet that is not going to fumble his words every time he/she speaks publicly.

Hard to know for sure, as they have been holding on to Biden as puppet-in-chief for longer than I expected.

@ButtWorldsMan I am not sorry he is gone. By "I take no joy," I am not looking to shame others. I understand that the phrase gets used to tell others that they should be ashamed if they gloat over others deaths. I just mean I personally am not celebrating deaths. But I will also not mourn for those like this either.

And good point, he would try to force it on everyone else. So the world is better off with him gone.

@ButtWorldsMan I take no joy in the death of others. However, I recall that it was the pro-vaxx crowd that made places on Reddit like r/HermanCainAward celebrating those who "died of Covid." You just know those faggots would tell you not to gloat about deaths like these, even though they did so themselves in the opposite direction.

So if you encounter that sort of thing, remember who you are dealing with. Besides, "Covid deaths" are bullshit when you consider the loose criteria.

@Stahesh This sort of already exist with Rosario + Vampire. It sucks, like the vast majority of harem anime out there, because the main character does nothing while a whole lot of women are obsessed with him just because he exists.

Twilight is crap for the same reasons, just with the girl being the character that does nothing while she is chased by more than one guy.

@supersid333 @AngryWraith @SpurgAnon My statement was not trying to say that you were did not get it (clearly you do), but rather that it is ridiculous to impose this sort of law. Though I did not consider just "owning" an empty store for 6 months to technically comply with the idiotic law. I am sure if such a law were to pass, they would also force the owners to keep it running and not just let it lay empty.