Based_Accelerationist @[email protected]

@Zeb Not unless you also replace the majority of the population. If you removed all the politicians and the technological systems they use to control you, you'd still be left with millions of people who put safety over freedom and are eager to submit to the group for comfort and protection. They'd quickly vote their way back into a system that hates them all in the name of "free stuff".

Government won't stay limited if you don't have freedom-loving men willing to physically keep it in check.

@Zeb The government is a mirror to the people, even a corrupt one.

If everyone sells their labor to the highest bidder, with no concern for long term effects and puts profit before values, why should the government be any different? Why shouldn't politicians accept Jewish money and screw their own spineless people? If we're too weak to fight against corruption, why should anyone do it on our behalf?

We're all corrupt and amoral, top to bottom and we will get the punishment we asked for.

Isn't it ironic that the people keeping this anti-male, anti-freedom and anti-individualism system afloat, are neither women, Jewish nor welfare sponges?

It's men, it's the average "not my problem"/"just following orders" schmuck. Not only do they accept the slavery, they enable it everyday.
Those who think they were "brainwashed" haven't interacted with them enough. Their passive-aggressive nature and subversive behavior is genetic to some extent.

So who's the real enemy here? Not big pharma.

@shortstories @sardonicsmile

And the kind of men we want to select are the ugly but well off? In that case, look no further than Brian Stelter or Tim Pool.

Which men are the cause of our current social degradation and corruption? The handsome but poor? Or the Jews? No seriously, do we want more betas who work for the system and make up for their subpar genes by responsibly bending the knee harder?
If we actually selected the dumb and handsome, you'd have a chaotic and masculine society.

@sardonicsmile He's not wrong. Soldiers and police officers are always taught to blindly follow orders, no civilization ever did that differently. Collectivism is great in warfare, nothing like a fearless robot army that will follow any command given to them.

However, that same collectivism that is so useful during wartime, is also a death sentence when you have prolonged peace, as it greatly promotes corruption. Men must think for themselves, even when told otherwise, it's the only way.

@sardonicsmile That depends on whether you consider regular sex, prostitution. In my view, if a soldier really believes in what he's fighting for (like a girl who has sex with her boyfriend she likes), then it's not prostitution, even if the soldier/girl appreciate the other benefits that such a relationship brings, or even if the government/boyfriend are just using their bodies to their own ends.

@Indignation My favorite rabbi

@sardonicsmile Let's look at the alternative, no conscription. Ok, so who does the fighting? Foreign mercenaries? Just know whoever you pick, that's the group your politicians will answer to. Same reason why European countries answer to the US, the people with the guns (plus drones and missiles in current year) always call the shots.

Now if only US soldiers weren't whores who fought for Israel and had the courage to revolt. WW2 would've been completely different, for starters.

@sardonicsmile It's only prostitution if the men fight for a country/cause they don't personally support, because they're too scared or are simply mercenaries. Men have to fight for something, if it isn't to defend their nation, then it should be against their government. The real prostitution isn't conscription, but the "just following orders" mentality. If you're told to fight for something you don't respect, REVOLT.

@Tfmonkey Coincidentally, KnowMoreNews just released a compilation of rabbis partially revealing what they think about Christianity and Islam. And this view that Christianity was nothing more than controlled opposition and the conquering arm of Judaism, is nothing new. Some of the people on this video are merely quoting famous Torah scholars of the Middle Ages, like Maimonides, who at the time, said the exact same thing:

@VooDooMedic That picture with that description should be titled "The fall of the Western Chad".

Consuming unhealthy food and drinks and wasting his physical attributes as his government replaces him with "minorities" who are actually the majority.

His grand-parents should've been outside in the rain, taking back their country. Now it's too late for chad and the best he can do is stay inside, sit on his comfortable chair and watch the world burn through his computer screen. Could be worse...

@Tfmonkey @Nazareno Tells you all you need to know about these people, doesn't it? They are indeed only interested in "victory" and not liberty. It's so cool to be peaceful and surrender to the man. Everyone wants a Trump mugshot now.
It's disgusting how they twist cowardice as bravery and vice-versa.

@Nazareno Wow, you tell 'em Pupu. Is he trying to appeal to cuckservatives in America with that kind of political posturing?

Feminism is still allowed. Not holohoax "denial" though, that's forbidden in Russia. Until I see Putin drop the Yamaka, I'm not convinced he will let Israel fall.

@Tfmonkey And as for what it accomplished, look no further than present day, where EVERYONE sucks Jew cock. They're God's chosen people, so says every Abrahamic religion. How do you think that happened?

@Tfmonkey Since you asked it on the show: The point of Christianity was never to unite people, the goal was to destroy paganism (non-Jewish beliefs). Jews conquered Europeans through their culture/values.

"Oh but Jews and Christians fought each other, so they couldn't possibly be part of the same psyop!" And Christians fought other Christians. And Democrats fight Republicans. Just because there are internal conflicts and rivalries, it doesn't mean they don't ultimately work in tandem.

@UncleIroh Judging by how most gays (especially bottoms) emulate women's behavior, I'd say they're favorable to female nature. To them it's probably a symbol of status and power over men, for they too wish they could be treated like an entitled princess who gets whatever she wants. There's little else they crave more.

They're also group thinkers that tend to be extremely subversive and greedy. In many ways, they're like Jews and they're definitely not straight men's allies.

@Indignation They're paid and promoted to defend the elite's interests. He would probably be nothing without that Jewish money. They're whores, they sell everyone, including themselves, for a little money and power.

I don't think he's either an atheist or a christian, he's really just a whore, he's whatever he needs to be to appeal to the right people, so no wonder you can't get a straight answer from him.

@Stahesh I haven't seen many people, other than TFM occasionally, shut down Halsey with facts and logic. Just remember they like it when their opposition attacks them for being Jewish and they use that to their advantage.

Still, it's not about changing Halsey's mind, he's a zionist, it's about countering his arguments and preventing other people from falling for them. Attacking him directly (on the internet no less) is pointless.