Based_Accelerationist @[email protected]

@sardonicsmile Except by facing the bullies I actually became mentally tougher. I used to avoid fights at all costs and I lacked confidence. If it wasn't for being bullied, I wouldn't have had the need to overcome those fears. Now some of my fondest memories are of me punching those kids in the face.

As for why I was picked on, it was because I lacked social skills at the time and didn't make friends. So yeah, social status.

@sardonicsmile If you're dealing with school gangs, then your only option is to avoid them. But if it's just one tough guy and the others are regular kids, you usually just need to send him to the hospital once. I was both bullied and a bully and those experiences taught me a few things. I can say they also made me mentally tougher.

People only care about power/status, if you're on top, you're the good guy, if not then you're a loser with nothing to offer. Kids are no different.

@Stahesh Absolutely, if anyone survives, it will be them, because they're everywhere and play both sides. The only question I have, is if they're willing to let Israel burn, to accomplish their goal.

@Stahesh Yes, Russia doesn't want WW3, they'd much rather if the West dies without taking anyone else down with them, but that is NOT going to happen. The West, controlled by the "Cathedral", is being ordered to provoke Russia until they nuke each other. That is the plan. That long term strategy of killing the West like the Soviet Union, won't be allowed to happen.

So the question is, who will be left standing once all is said and done? Not the West and probably not Russia.

Klaus Schwab isn't in hiding afraid of Russia and China either, he retired probably because he's old and sick, the World Economic Forum is still owned by his family and will continue existing. He's not the mastermind anyway.

Additionally, Chabad Lubavitch Jews claim they own Putin and control the economy. Plus it's illegal to deny the holohoax in Russia. But how great is it, that they're arming everyone who hates the West, am I right? I think we can all see how this is going to end.

Rest assured, "we" are NOT winning. The globalist agenda hasn't stopped because of Russia/China. They're still pumping more vaccines, they're still replacing you with migrants, poisoning your food and even trying to block out the sun, And why would they stop? China is the model for the "Cathedral", they're not going to dismantle the UN, this is the plan.

The "Cathedral" didn't destroy itself because they're retarded, they destroyed the West because that was always the goal.

@VooDooMedic France fell in WW2, as did the rest of Europe. This is just the culmination of that defeat. But other than the buildings, there's not much of value the migrants can damage in Europe. The natives were already doomed when they accepted Nato/US slavery.

@Wopu Yeah, sucks that they're going to destroy France. I had hoped they would depopulate mainly through mRNA shots, as that would've been a much nicer selection, but oh well, WW3 it is.
Nothing we can do against the 99% other than distancing ourselves from them.

@Wopu Nice. Anyone but that Le Pen Israel loving controlled opposition.

Is it over for France and the rest of the EU? Yeah. Is it over because of the result of some theatrical elections? No, it's over because the US (Israel) conquered them through NATO. And yes, the French are going to get replaced by migrants. But who cares? Not the French, they'll keep bending the knee, so I don't care if they're replaced either. Let's hope the migrant men have more testosterone.

@Mongoliaboo @Tfmonkey But the demographic enforcing the tyranny and giving women rights, aren't women, Jews nor welfare sponges. It's the average man, the "not my problem"/"just following orders" law abiding taxpayer. Women are a non-issue, Jews are nothing without the goyim and welfare sponges aren't financing the dystopia. So who's really at fault? Who's really the problem?

@shortstories In the current system, they'd be no different. But a male feminist is still worse. Women are a non-factor. Had they been the ones to give themselves rights and enforce feminism, then yeah, a female leader would be my choice. But that's not what happened, it was men who destroyed patriarchy and enforced feminism. Women aren't competent or dangerous enough to be an issue. The danger are collectivist men.

@UncleIroh I too am expecting pain and bloodshed, but there is no guarantee they won't lead to slavery. Imagine the West faces a complete defeat and is annexed by China, through the UN. Well, no need to change course at all, the UN was already planning for the West to become China. Sure, you'll have patriarchy, as in the ruling class will be mostly men, but it'll be a dystopia all the same.
I don't care if men are in power, I just want to live freely, that's the only W that matters in my book.

@UncleIroh I'm not concerned about patriarchy at all, because women are a non-factor, they weren't even the ones that gave themselves rights. TWRA is inevitable, as long as the weak are culled, that's what I'm worried about.
Hell, I'd take a fictional matriarchy (would never work in real life) if it meant collectivism was destroyed and individualism/freedom were promoted.

Sadly the West is irredeemable and the East, China specifically, is the model for the Cathedral. There are no good options.

@RodrickSage They won't do anything, asians have even less testosterone than Whites.
They will take it and they will like it, as long as they have a job to go to and anime to watch.

@UncleIroh @Zeb I agree we need both, but we've killed too many and destroyed their smaller groups/cultures throughout the centuries, individualists are outnumbered at least a 1000 to 1. Imperialism and globalism wiped out individualism.

The only way humans won't evolve to become an ant-like colony of individually weak NPCs at this point, is if the balance is restored and these sheep leave the gene pool somehow, otherwise collectivism WILL become human nature for good. No future is worse.

@themodernstoic If the men were made weak by women, then it's only because their fathers allowed it. And even then, I don't buy that excuse at all. Men became weak because they bent the knee one too many times. The brave and strong who didn't submit to the government were hunted down and either killed or jailed. Weak men rose to power, not because of women (not at first anyway), but because of their sheer numbers and technological advancements, the strong individualists just couldn't compete.

@UncleIroh @Zeb To an extent yes, but I refuse to call it "human nature" as it's not universal. Sure, collectivists are the majority. However, there are enough people out there who are incapable of blindly following the group, even if it's by far the safer and more financially rewarding option.
Just like the native Americans that couldn't be broken and enslaved to the degree other people could, some humans have different instincts that might become the norm in the right circumstances.

@Tfmonkey They're only a problem if you don't want this sick society to collapse. If on the other hand, you want to promote the disease, then sure, take their rights away so we can have more normies and more people on a planet that doesn't have enough space and resources for them.

Women are just a symptom of the problem. Who is enforcing the tyranny and "just following orders"? Is it the women, the Jews, the welfare sponges, OR is it just your average schmuck? Who's really the problem?