Uncle Iroh ☑️ @[email protected]

@DoubleD @sardonicsmile

More accurately, force in the service of ideology at work.

There are comparable photos where this was done in the service of any abstract noun you can think of - Democracy, War on Drugs, War on Terror, etc..

@Justicar

I can't stop staring at this. It's like a fantasy that this was even real.

@ffbb1c5748f93fe48768b493b4117b6a4776de34a2ae78dfb373fe8794510560 @37712

@Based_Accelerationist @Mongoliaboo @mrhorsetwat

China making this law is super important because it draws a direct and useful comparison.

The US has explicitly created a system that exploits the male drive to marry and create a family. It's actively hostile to families by incentivizing wives to cheat. Structurally.

China has explicitly created the exact opposite system, choosing to support family creation over bullshit Feminist ideals.

Both are cynical, but one is objectively much worse.

@Based_Accelerationist @Mongoliaboo @mrhorsetwat

One of the rare times BasedRetard has a point, but only very specifically - individual men SHOULD to have the right to punish cheating wives.

I disagree in this respect - the State as he points out, IS a stakeholder in military marriages since it directly affects national security - morale, stability, fiscal policy for broken families, etc..

On balance, China is doing the right thing as majority stakeholder, but it should extend to normies too

@Gonzo17

The story of Adam is meant to be instructive.

Eve clearly sinned and was therefore reprimanded. She was punished with painful childbirth and eternal submission to Adam.

Adam's sin was greater for prioritizing pussy-begging to Eve instead of trusting in God's Word.

Adam was doubly punished - toiling the land AND having to lead Eve, AND dealing with her bitchy resentment AND battling his urge to simp. This is divine red-pill truth and wisdom.

God is based. Always has been,

@Justicar

Your argument is nonsense.

Premise 1: I HATE X player from football team Y
Conclusion: I hate ALL football

That's illogical nonsense. It's neither valid nor sound.

Here's your crappy argument in syllogistic form, where P= Premise and C= Conclusion:

P1: All A are B
P2: C is A
C: Therefore, C is B

It's logically invalid AND unsound.

Try again, but try harder.

@RodrickSage

Democrats kill millions of egg-laying chickens before Trump's inauguration, and then ..

@Gonzo17

And twice on Shabat

@TenaciousGoat @Wopu

I've seen the same pattern among people I've known for decades - tons of good, stable people never having kids.

It's a waste.

@DoubleD @ButtWorldsMan

The hugest W, loving it.

@sardonicsmile

It's been in my top 5 since it came out. Love it.

@Mr_Mister @CheshireHuman @VooDooMedic

Yes but what leads to Feminism?

Rich Jews and butt sex. It's always Jews and butt sex.

@marlathetourist

Jewish rent-a-mobs.

I was hoping these would magically disappear now that the USAID money spigot has been turned off.

I guess they moved from taxpayer funding to billionaire funding.

Honestly, I never thought I'd get to see a no-shit elite factional war being fought so openly.

@DoubleD @Mongoliaboo

Definitely.

That extends to boys too. The canonical case in point for me will always be Bach's St Matthews Passion.

The most moving parts are the choruses and chorales where the boys choir cuts through.

Unfortunately, over the last 30 years or so it has been fashionable to use adult women and girls to voice these parts and frankly it ruins the whole performance.

I love a good soprano as much as the next man, but stop messing with Bach's intention, arrghh!!